Talk:Canadian Copyright in Contrast to American Copyright: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>Milton Beychok
m (→‎Comments: Not ready for Approval, in my opinion)
Line 21: Line 21:


=== Comments ===
=== Comments ===
I hope that I don't sound like a stickler for formatting ... but I don't believe that this article is ready for approval because:
*It has no "Definition" subpage. It should be created and include a definition.
*It has no "Related Articles" subpage or "Bibliography" subpage or "External Links" subpage. All 3 should at least be created and at least 2 of them should be populated to some extent.
*The references are not formatted as they should be. References should not include "raw" urls like http://www.gowlings.com/KnowledgeCentre/article.asp?pubID=2231 . See [[Help:Index/Formatting/References]] for a tutorial on how to create Citizendium references.
*The author, Patrick Nikulak, is not an Editor, yet he has signed the Metadata page as the "ToA Editor" nominating the article for approval. Is that kosher???
As for the writing style of the main article, a brief scan disclosed that it lacks a good number of commas and there are some other typos that need correcting. I would suggest that one of our Linguistic experts, like Ro Thorpe, review the article from the viewpoint of spelling and grammar.
I am no copyright expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the actual content of the article appears to be good
and knowledgeable to me.
Overall, I would rate this article as a status 2 (Developing article) rather than a status 1 (Developed completely or nearly so). [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 02:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:46, 19 March 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Definition [?]
 Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Law, Education and Sociology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  Canadian English
To do.

Metadata here


Moved from one with the wrong title. Patrick Nikulak 16:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Patrick, next time we'll use the 'move' tab to move an article to a new page rather than a copy and paste. That way the history of your edits will come with the article. If you have trouble, feel free to drop a note on my talk page. D. Matt Innis 23:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


Approval Process: Approval notice

Call for review: Anthony.Sebastian 23:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested by author User:Patrick Nikulak

Call for Approval:

Approval notice:

Certification of Approval:

Please discuss the article below, under 'Comments'.  Canadian Copyright in Contrast to American Copyright/Approval is for brief official referee's only!

Comments

I hope that I don't sound like a stickler for formatting ... but I don't believe that this article is ready for approval because:

  • It has no "Definition" subpage. It should be created and include a definition.
  • It has no "Related Articles" subpage or "Bibliography" subpage or "External Links" subpage. All 3 should at least be created and at least 2 of them should be populated to some extent.
  • The references are not formatted as they should be. References should not include "raw" urls like http://www.gowlings.com/KnowledgeCentre/article.asp?pubID=2231 . See Help:Index/Formatting/References for a tutorial on how to create Citizendium references.
  • The author, Patrick Nikulak, is not an Editor, yet he has signed the Metadata page as the "ToA Editor" nominating the article for approval. Is that kosher???

As for the writing style of the main article, a brief scan disclosed that it lacks a good number of commas and there are some other typos that need correcting. I would suggest that one of our Linguistic experts, like Ro Thorpe, review the article from the viewpoint of spelling and grammar.

I am no copyright expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the actual content of the article appears to be good and knowledgeable to me.

Overall, I would rate this article as a status 2 (Developing article) rather than a status 1 (Developed completely or nearly so). Milton Beychok 02:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Canadian_Copyright_in_Contrast_to_American_Copyright&oldid=838055"