User:John R. Brews/Coriolis force: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews |
imported>John R. Brews |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:::<math>=-A (\omega^2 +\Omega^2)\sin\omega t \left(\cos\Omega t\ \mathbf i + \sin \Omega t\ \mathbf j \right) -A 2 \omega \Omega \cos\omega t \left(\sin\Omega t\ \mathbf i - \cos \Omega t\ \mathbf j \right) </math> | :::<math>=-A (\omega^2 +\Omega^2)\sin\omega t \left(\cos\Omega t\ \mathbf i + \sin \Omega t\ \mathbf j \right) -A 2 \omega \Omega \cos\omega t \left(\sin\Omega t\ \mathbf i - \cos \Omega t\ \mathbf j \right) </math> | ||
:::<math>=-A (\omega^2 +\Omega^2)\sin\omega t \ \mathbf{u_r} - A 2 \omega \Omega \cos\omega t \ \mathbf{u_t} \ . </math> | :::<math>=-A (\omega^2 +\Omega^2)\sin\omega t \ \mathbf{u_r} - A 2 \omega \Omega \cos\omega t \ \mathbf{u_t} \ . </math> | ||
Here '''''u<sub>t</sub>''''' is a unit magnitude vector orthogonal to the radial vector '''''u<sub>r</sub>''''' in the ''xy''-plane. | Here '''''u<sub>t</sub>''''' is a unit magnitude vector orthogonal to the radial vector '''''u<sub>r</sub>''''' in the ''xy''-plane. Unlike the inertial frame acceleration, which always is in the radial direction, the Earth observer sees a perpendicular component that causes the plane of the pendulum to rotate. | ||
This result can be compared with the inertial frame acceleration: | This result can be compared with the inertial frame acceleration: | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 21 February 2011
The Coriolis force is a force experienced by a object traversing a path in a rotating framework that is proportional to its speed and also to the sine of the angle between its direction of movement and the axis of rotation. It is one of three such inertial forces that appear in an accelerating frame of reference due to the acceleration of the frame, the other two being the centrifugal force and the Euler force. The mathematical expression for the Coriolis force appeared in an 1835 paper by a French scientist Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis in connection with the theory of water wheels, and also in the tidal equations of Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1778.
Although sometimes referred to as an apparent force, it can have very real effects.
Reference frames
Newton's laws of motion are expressed for observations made in an inertial frame of reference, that is, in any frame of reference that is in straight-line motion at constant speed relative to the "fixed stars", an historical reference taken today to refer to the entire universe. However, everyday experience does not take place in such a reference frame. For example, we live upon planet Earth, which rotates about its axis (an accelerated motion), orbits the Sun (another accelerated motion), and moves with the Milky Way (still another accelerated motion).
The question then arises as to how to connect experiences in accelerating frames with Newton's laws that are not formulated for such situations. The answer lies in the introduction of inertial forces, which are forces observed in the accelerating reference frame, due to its motion, but are not forces recognized in an inertial frame. These inertial forces are included in Newton's laws of motion, and with their inclusion Newton's laws work just as they would in an inertial frame. Coriolis force is one of these inertial forces, the other two being the centrifugal force and the Euler force.
These motions are slight, but the Coriolis force does affect aiming artillery pieces and plotting transoceanic air flights. The way Coriolis forces work is illustrated below by a few examples.
Foucault pendulum
The Foucault pendulum, or Foucault's pendulum, demonstrated in Paris in 1851, is named after the French physicist Léon Foucault. It is a device that demonstrates the rotation of the Earth. According to an inertial observer, the pendulum swings in a plane fixed relative to the "fixed stars", while as observed on Earth this plane appears to rotate. For most pendulums, the effect is masked by other complications, so some care must be taken in constructing a successful pendulum, particularly to insure the hanger exerts no torque upon the pendulum and is immune to wear.[1]
The easiest way to understand the operation is to imagine the pendulum at the North pole, shown in the figure. As the pendulum swings, the Earth rotates and it appears to the Earth-bound observer that every 24 hours the pendulum returns to its initial plane of oscillation.
Approximations and idealizations
In the inertial frame of reference, the pendulum swings back in forth in a plane. However, at the top of its swing it has zero velocity and the bob is subject to no centrifugal force, while at the bottom of its swing it moves rapidly, and is subject to considerable centrifugal force. Consequently, the tension in the wire varies appreciably if the swing has large amplitude, and the wire will stretch as the bob descends, meaning the orbit is not a circle. That complicates the analysis without adding to any insight into the experiment.
In the rotating Earth frame of reference, the pendulum does not swing in a plane, because the Earth turns during its swing, making the projection onto a horizontal plane of the pendulum's path describe an arc, not a straight line. That introduces further complications for analysis in the Earth frame of reference.
To simplify the analysis and make clear what the experiment is about, the pendulum is idealized as executing very small amplitude swings, such that the bob's change in elevation is negligible, the centrifugal force varies negligibly, and the tension in the wire has always a magnitude given by the force of gravity, mg, where g is the acceleration due to gravity and m is the mass of the bob.
Under these circumstances, if we introduce coordinate axes with z the vertical and x and y in the horizontal plane, the movement of the pendulum is analyzed entirely in the xy-plane. The problem in the inertial frame becomes one of watching the bob travel back and forth along the same direction parallel to the ground at the North pole, while from the Earth frame, one watches the same thing from a rotating carousel.
Inertial frame
In the inertial frame the path of the bob is a straight line in the xy-plane. If the origin is taken at the center of the swing, the path is described as:
where ur is a unit magnitude vector pointing along the path of the bob, and r is the radius vector from the origin to the bob. The frequency ω is related to the period T of the swing as:
The net force on the bob is therefore:
This net force upon the bob (within the idealizations outlined above) is the resultant of the tension in the wire and the force due to gravity, both of which are agreed upon by the Earth observer and the inertial observer as identical facts of life.
Earth frame
The Earth coordinate axes rotate with the angular rate Ω of the Earth about the pole. Thus, the unit vector ur is described from Earth at any given time t as:
with i, j unit vectors in the x- and y-directions. Consequently, the path of the bob in the Earth frame is:
The velocity of the bob is:
The acceleration of the bob is:
Here ut is a unit magnitude vector orthogonal to the radial vector ur in the xy-plane. Unlike the inertial frame acceleration, which always is in the radial direction, the Earth observer sees a perpendicular component that causes the plane of the pendulum to rotate.
This result can be compared with the inertial frame acceleration:
Evidently the Earth observer sees the acceleration of the inertial observer with two additional terms. The force on the bob due to wire tension and gravity must be the same for both observers:
In other words, the Earth observer obtains the same net force upon the bob as does the inertial observer, but to obtain the forces resulting from tension and gravity, the force based upon the Earth observer's acceleration must be supplemented by the centrifugal force observed due to rotation:
and the observed Coriolis force:
which accounts (for the Earth observer) for the daily precession of the pendulum's orbit.
Notes
- ↑ An account of some of these practical matters is found in AC Longden (April 19, 1919). "On the irregularities of motion of the Foucault pendulum". Physical Review vol. 13 (no. 4): pp. 142 ff. A more modern account is William Tobin (2003). “Appendix D: Building a Foucault pendulum”, The life and science of Léon Foucault: the man who proved the earth rotates. Cambridge University Press, pp. 307 ff. ISBN 0521808553.