User talk:John Stephenson/imagelist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (question for John) |
imported>John Stephenson (copyvios) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
John, thanks for your work here. How should I interpret your nomenclature? Are the ones noted with "copyright" or "fair use" needing to be deleted or just questionable? [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 16:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | John, thanks for your work here. How should I interpret your nomenclature? Are the ones noted with "copyright" or "fair use" needing to be deleted or just questionable? [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 16:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Hi, and thanks for looking over this. I am not claiming that all these be deleted because in some case I am unsure whether they are copyvios. The difference between "fair use" and "copyrighted" is only slight, if any, because I assume 'fair use' is claimed for all. Generally, there is a red box template on the ones marked "copyrighted" which says that the material is or may be considered 'fair use', while on the ones which are marked "fair use" in the table, there is also some attempt at a rationale. Maybe the former are more likely candidates for deletion. This is all up for debate on the forums and the EC, though. The ones I think are copyvios are the ones that say "no real name" or just "no info". There are also ones where the source is a dead link, so effectively may be copyvios. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 08:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:21, 19 January 2011
John, thanks for your work here. How should I interpret your nomenclature? Are the ones noted with "copyright" or "fair use" needing to be deleted or just questionable? D. Matt Innis 16:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for looking over this. I am not claiming that all these be deleted because in some case I am unsure whether they are copyvios. The difference between "fair use" and "copyrighted" is only slight, if any, because I assume 'fair use' is claimed for all. Generally, there is a red box template on the ones marked "copyrighted" which says that the material is or may be considered 'fair use', while on the ones which are marked "fair use" in the table, there is also some attempt at a rationale. Maybe the former are more likely candidates for deletion. This is all up for debate on the forums and the EC, though. The ones I think are copyvios are the ones that say "no real name" or just "no info". There are also ones where the source is a dead link, so effectively may be copyvios. John Stephenson 08:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)