Talk:Monty Hall problem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
imported>Aleta Curry (→External link: well, we're all agreed) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::: That's about what I thought. I was, however, uncertain if current policy classifies such a link as self-promotion. Was I saying it too unfriendly? But, in any case, the link cannot replace an unwritten article. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ::: That's about what I thought. I was, however, uncertain if current policy classifies such a link as self-promotion. Was I saying it too unfriendly? But, in any case, the link cannot replace an unwritten article. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::Oh, I don't know about unfriendly, but Richard is new here so I didn't want him to think his efforts were unappreciated. [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
::::While we may indeed need to clarify the policy with an EC motion, I've never thought that a link to a clearly noncommercial page is self-promotion. This is even more the case when pointing to one's own peer-reviewed publications and presentations, which I have done -- I might not have written them if I thought there were better references. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ::::While we may indeed need to clarify the policy with an EC motion, I've never thought that a link to a clearly noncommercial page is self-promotion. This is even more the case when pointing to one's own peer-reviewed publications and presentations, which I have done -- I might not have written them if I thought there were better references. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::I had some discussion about this with Larry years ago, with respect to using one's own articles if one were a) an authority in the field or b) the only person writing in the field! His answer, basically, was 'use common sense and ask an(other) Editor to review/confirm'. | |||
:::::[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Problem variant as a cartoon== | ==Problem variant as a cartoon== | ||
I must share a memorable cartoon idea based on this problem, from ''Playboy'' (I read it for the cartoons). The problem is reduced to two doors, and the contestant is faced with legends of "damned if you do" and "damned if you don't". Monty Hall, the game show host, is in devil garb, prodding the contestant with a pitchfork. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | I must share a memorable cartoon idea based on this problem, from ''Playboy'' (I read it for the cartoons). The problem is reduced to two doors, and the contestant is faced with legends of "damned if you do" and "damned if you don't". Monty Hall, the game show host, is in devil garb, prodding the contestant with a pitchfork. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
::As an aside, is Monty Hall his real name, or was it a joke referring to 3 card Monte? [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:09, 15 January 2011
External link
Richard, CZ does not allow self-promotion. Therefore I removed the link to your paper. I hope you understand this and agree with it. After some progress has been made with the main article, we may put it (together with other references) on the Bibliography subpage. --Peter Schmitt 23:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that we ought to see how the article progresses, but I wouldn't see a problem with adding that particular paper to the Bibliography if the math editors think it is appropriate since it is specifically about the subject and he is not selling anything. It also helps to let someone else place the link for you. D. Matt Innis 00:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Agree, at a quick glance the paper does not appear to be specific self-promotion, but it should not be on the main page.
- Go ahead and add it to the Bibliography page and let's encourage a maths editor to review it for appropriateness.
- I'd like to see this article expanded fairly quickly; at present it doesn't tell us exactly what the Monty Hall problem is. Putting the definition as the introduction would probably be enough of a start.
- Aleta Curry 00:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- That's about what I thought. I was, however, uncertain if current policy classifies such a link as self-promotion. Was I saying it too unfriendly? But, in any case, the link cannot replace an unwritten article. --Peter Schmitt 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I don't know about unfriendly, but Richard is new here so I didn't want him to think his efforts were unappreciated. Aleta Curry 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- While we may indeed need to clarify the policy with an EC motion, I've never thought that a link to a clearly noncommercial page is self-promotion. This is even more the case when pointing to one's own peer-reviewed publications and presentations, which I have done -- I might not have written them if I thought there were better references. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- I had some discussion about this with Larry years ago, with respect to using one's own articles if one were a) an authority in the field or b) the only person writing in the field! His answer, basically, was 'use common sense and ask an(other) Editor to review/confirm'.
- Aleta Curry 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Problem variant as a cartoon
I must share a memorable cartoon idea based on this problem, from Playboy (I read it for the cartoons). The problem is reduced to two doors, and the contestant is faced with legends of "damned if you do" and "damned if you don't". Monty Hall, the game show host, is in devil garb, prodding the contestant with a pitchfork. Howard C. Berkowitz 00:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- As an aside, is Monty Hall his real name, or was it a joke referring to 3 card Monte? Aleta Curry 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)