Entanglement (physics)/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→Historic: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| pages = 777–780 | | pages = 777–780 | ||
| url = | | url = | ||
}}. | }} (available also [http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/QM/ here]). | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
Revision as of 14:39, 25 September 2010
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Historic
Einstein, Albert; Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen (1935), "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?", Physical Review 47: 777–780 (available also here).
Bell, J. S. (1964), "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox", Physics 1 (3): 195–200 (available also here).
Non-technical
Mermin, N. David (1985), "Is the Moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory", Physics Today 38 (4): 38–47 (available also here and elsewhere).
Bell, John; A. Shimony & M. Horne et al. (1985), "An exchange on local beables", Dialectica 39 (2): 85–110.
Technical
Buhrman, Harry; Richard Cleve & Serge Massar et al. (2010), "Nonlocality and communication complexity", Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (1): 665–698 (also arXiv).