User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Obstacles: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(started)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
__NOTOC__


==Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing==
==Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing==
===Technical===
*Integration with reference managers, particularly for items not available online
===Social===
====Habits====
*Scholars are used to type their manuscripts in Word processors for an end product designed for print
====Attitudes====
*recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general
*recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general
**similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects
**similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects
*scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited
*scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited

Revision as of 21:27, 19 August 2010


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Session start · Talk start · Quotes · Background · Wikis as science communication platforms ·
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo


Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing

Technical

  • Integration with reference managers, particularly for items not available online

Social

Habits

  • Scholars are used to type their manuscripts in Word processors for an end product designed for print

Attitudes

  • recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general
    • similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects
  • scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited