Template:CharterVote2/36/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (Clarifying) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (reworded for clarity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude> | <noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude> | ||
I agree with Martin on | I agree with Martin's comment on art. 37, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way: | ||
<blockquote>Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either: | <blockquote>Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either: | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 19 July 2010
I agree with Martin's comment on art. 37, and suggest to delete 37, while rephrasing 36 in the following way:
Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:
- New information is available; or
- A technical error was made during the previous formal procedure.
--Daniel Mietchen 22:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Or are you proposing to delete 37? I Agree with the text, in either case. Russell D. Jones 23:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter which of the two is deleted after the merger, but we have to pick one, and I suggest 37. --Daniel Mietchen 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)