Talk:Counterfactual history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎Relationship to the science fiction genre?: history is history, fiction is fiction)
Line 4: Line 4:
Is there a reasonable parallel to the alternate history genre? --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Is there a reasonable parallel to the alternate history genre? --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
:No. [[Robert A. Heinlein|Heinlein]] was writing fiction; Historians who practice counterfactual history are writing history but (as I wrote in the article) are arguing from analogy.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
:No. [[Robert A. Heinlein|Heinlein]] was writing fiction; Historians who practice counterfactual history are writing history but (as I wrote in the article) are arguing from analogy.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
::As a guy who has actually written a couple of parallel-history novels, I would say that the counterfactual historians are, by definition, writing "fictional history".  What else could it be qualified as?  As opposed to "historical history," as written by, say, A.J.P. Taylor or Sam Morison. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 21:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:48, 27 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A history genre that argues by analogy to demonstrate outcomes that did not occur. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category History [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Historiography
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Relationship to the science fiction genre?

Is there a reasonable parallel to the alternate history genre? --Howard C. Berkowitz 21:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

No. Heinlein was writing fiction; Historians who practice counterfactual history are writing history but (as I wrote in the article) are arguing from analogy. Russell D. Jones 21:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
As a guy who has actually written a couple of parallel-history novels, I would say that the counterfactual historians are, by definition, writing "fictional history". What else could it be qualified as? As opposed to "historical history," as written by, say, A.J.P. Taylor or Sam Morison. Hayford Peirce 21:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)