User talk:Peter Schmitt/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→tennis template: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I replied [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick_Gardner#Bond_.28financial.29 on Nick's page]. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 03:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | I replied [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Nick_Gardner#Bond_.28financial.29 on Nick's page]. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 03:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== tennis template == | |||
Hi, Peter, thanks for the help! If you look at the final result at http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Tennis/Catalogs/Famous_players things now look just about perfect. Except, I think, there's no very pale blue in the '''National #1 Player''' box, (it's hard for me to tell), and there's also an unnecessary across the '''Biographical''' section. Both can be left as are. If they can be corrected, so much the better but it's not, in my judgment, essential. Right now, I'm through fiddling, so if you want to try to fix those two other elements, I won't be conflicting with you. Thanks! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 22:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:45, 28 January 2010
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Where Peter lives it is approximately: 17:57
| < | 2009(May19-Dec31) / 2010(Jan01-Aug28) / Sep 2010--2011 |
|---|
Charter: Draft // C1 C2 C3 C4 // my comments on current draft / my draft
Catalog discussion
Hi, Peter, you might take a look at http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Talk:Singer-songwriter#What_.22Catalogs.22_are.2C_or_can_be where we're also discussing Catalogs. Hayford Peirce 17:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hayford, but I know. It is my fault that it spreaded to crime fiction, I fear. --Peter Schmitt 19:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Nick's talk page discussion
I replied on Nick's page. D. Matt Innis 03:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
tennis template
Hi, Peter, thanks for the help! If you look at the final result at http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Tennis/Catalogs/Famous_players things now look just about perfect. Except, I think, there's no very pale blue in the National #1 Player box, (it's hard for me to tell), and there's also an unnecessary across the Biographical section. Both can be left as are. If they can be corrected, so much the better but it's not, in my judgment, essential. Right now, I'm through fiddling, so if you want to try to fix those two other elements, I won't be conflicting with you. Thanks! Hayford Peirce 22:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)