Talk:Globalization: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎Enablers?: aw, come on, Howard!)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


::You know very well what the current meaning is! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
::You know very well what the current meaning is! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
:::No, I don't. I know some 12-steppers like it. I'm not going to give up rational meanings, or long-established traditions such as anthropomorphizing ships, because you dislike it. As I've said, change it if you like. I have other things to do than argue about the nuanced meaning of a header. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:42, 29 June 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The interaction of peoples, cultures, and businesses worldwide, which tend to overcome traditional national and cultural boundaries [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Politics, Economics and Sociology [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  International relations
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Unquestionably an article to start controversy

I am wedded to little in this, certainly including the workgroups. Globalization, regional alliances, and cultural exchange, however, need to be covered somewhere. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Enablers?

Really, Howard, isn't that a very loaded, and editorializing, word? Particularly since you don't try to explain it at all or to expand the concept in any way. I really suggest that you find another heading. Hayford Peirce 17:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Feel free to substitute something. I said the article was intended to elicit participation on an important issue. Actually, I don't consider "enabler" to be especially loaded. An enabler is anything that assists something to happen; teachers are enablers of literacy. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
You know very well what the current meaning is! Hayford Peirce 17:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
No, I don't. I know some 12-steppers like it. I'm not going to give up rational meanings, or long-established traditions such as anthropomorphizing ships, because you dislike it. As I've said, change it if you like. I have other things to do than argue about the nuanced meaning of a header. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Globalization&oldid=631880"