Deconfliction: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: '''Deconfliction''' is a military and engineering term that refers to the process of avoiding mutual interference, or outright hazards, among systems under the control of one's own sides. ...)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
'''Deconfliction''' is a military and engineering term that refers to the process of avoiding mutual interference, or outright hazards, among systems under the control of one's own sides. It is most often used in the context of preventing [[fratricide]], or having weapons hit one's own troops, but it has broader implications.
'''Deconfliction''' is a military and engineering term that refers to the process of avoiding mutual interference, or outright hazards, among systems under the control of one's own sides. It is most often used in the context of preventing [[fratricide]], or having weapons hit one's own troops, but it has broader implications.



Revision as of 08:57, 26 May 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Deconfliction is a military and engineering term that refers to the process of avoiding mutual interference, or outright hazards, among systems under the control of one's own sides. It is most often used in the context of preventing fratricide, or having weapons hit one's own troops, but it has broader implications.

For example, frequency deconfliction is an important part of military electronics planning. Many tactical radios are short range, so the same frequency can be used in different locations without mutual interference. A tactical reorganization without frequency deconfliction, however, could put, side-by-side, units trying to operate on the same frequency. A more subtle example of electronic conflict involves an enemy frequency, if one intelligence unit is gathering information from intercepting it, but another unit jams it in the interest of denying its use to the enemy. Hard decisions may need to be made if the value of the intelligence is greater than the value of the communications to the adversary's operations.

Various weapons can conflict with one another, although friendly forces are not involved. This is especially the case with nuclear weapons. After a nuclear burst, the local atmosphere is disturbed sufficiently that another warhead, passing through that disturbed air, may be thrown off course or even destroyed. When attacking a series of targets, assuming the missiles are coming from the north, a "ladder-north" targeting technique is appropriate: the southernmost target is hit first, and the successive targets "walk" north so a reentry vehicle never needs to fly through air disturbed by an earlier burst.

Cruise missiles using terrain contour mapping can conflict. They follow a precise internal map of ground terrain; it has been found that missiles can go off course if an earlier missile destroyed a building that a subsequent missile expected to use as a landmark.