User talk:Chris Day/sandbox1: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok m (Comments on proposal) |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Thanks, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC) | Thanks, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, all good comments. If i recall the proposal requires the details for implementation, however, I think I can rearrange that a bit. What i have written so far is on the fly, cutting and pasting some stuff from the forums. I'll try and keep the implementation details as a separate section and focus more on the concept. Especially on the success of your pilot. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 23:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:43, 15 January 2009
Chris, I read through your draft proposal as it now stands and it look very good to me. I understand that you must explain how the idea will be implemented but I really don't understand the tagging and the template stuff ... so I can't offer any useful suggestions about those parts.
It might be useful to include the fact that the pilot Chemical Engineering sub-workgroup now has 112 articles in it and 16 of them have been Approved. That is 18% of the 87 total approved CZ articles as listed in Category:Approved articles!!
It might also be useful to point out that a good many of those 112 articles have been categorized in Engineering, Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences workgroups to support your comments about how the sub-workgroups can be and will be inter-disciplinary.
Thanks, Milton Beychok 23:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, all good comments. If i recall the proposal requires the details for implementation, however, I think I can rearrange that a bit. What i have written so far is on the fly, cutting and pasting some stuff from the forums. I'll try and keep the implementation details as a separate section and focus more on the concept. Especially on the success of your pilot. Chris Day 23:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)