Talk:Exponential function: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jitse Niesen
(→‎Notation: reply: I think we should use ln)
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(→‎Notation: Concur)
Line 4: Line 4:


:The notation log(z) is more common in advanced mathematics. I have seen a quote to the effect that you can distinguish those that know maths by whether they use log or ln for the natural logarithm :-) But ln(z) is more common in the secondary schools (at least in my experience) and probably also in physics, and it is not ambiguous. I think that we should use ln(z), perhaps with the exception of articles on advanced (say graduate-level) mathematics. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
:The notation log(z) is more common in advanced mathematics. I have seen a quote to the effect that you can distinguish those that know maths by whether they use log or ln for the natural logarithm :-) But ln(z) is more common in the secondary schools (at least in my experience) and probably also in physics, and it is not ambiguous. I think that we should use ln(z), perhaps with the exception of articles on advanced (say graduate-level) mathematics. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
:Concur. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 13:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:33, 29 October 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Function of real or complex variable with the property that the function is equal to its first derivative. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Mathematics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Notation

I have a preference for the notation ln(z) for the inverse of exp(z). Is that not more common?--Paul Wormer 10:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The notation log(z) is more common in advanced mathematics. I have seen a quote to the effect that you can distinguish those that know maths by whether they use log or ln for the natural logarithm :-) But ln(z) is more common in the secondary schools (at least in my experience) and probably also in physics, and it is not ambiguous. I think that we should use ln(z), perhaps with the exception of articles on advanced (say graduate-level) mathematics. -- Jitse Niesen 13:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Concur. J. Noel Chiappa 13:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Exponential_function&oldid=547183"