CZ:Import: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Brian P. Long
(started page)
 
imported>Brian P. Long
Line 19: Line 19:




==Nominated External Articles==
==Nominated External Articles: Add your article down here==
Add your article down here:


[[CZ:Import/Gesenius]]
[[CZ:Import/Gesenius]]
*As far as I can tell, this is a pretty solid article from the 1911 Britannica on an important early [[Semitic languages|Semitic]] linguist. [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 01:14, 11 August 2008 (CDT)
*As far as I can tell, this is a pretty solid article from the 1911 Britannica on an important early [[Semitic languages|Semitic]] linguist. [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 01:14, 11 August 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 00:15, 11 August 2008

The Citizendium is its own project, and we have a set of goals and an ethos which set us apart from our rivals. Among these is that Citizendium is striving to create the best, most reliable free encyclopedia on the internet.

However, Citizens are also pragmatic, and we realize that there are cases where it makes sense to use other open (free or public domain) resources to make Citizendium better. Biographical information, for example, will tend to be fairly similar in general reference works. This page is designed to give you some brief guidelines about whether you are really helping the Citizendium out by importing that article; and to give contributors a place to temporarily upload articles.

The Procedure:

  1. Upload the article to this page, so that the URL reads CZ:Import/NEW IMPORT (or whatever). See example at CZ:Import/Gesenius. Add a link to the article, and, at the first asterisk, explain briefly why you think it makes sense to import it. Sign it with ~~~~.
  2. Wait a week for feedback from other contributors. In many cases, it will be preferable to actively solicit opinions (with email, on User talk: pages, etc.) than to wait passively for feedback. While you are waiting, it is always a good idea to do your own research. Does the article seem to be consistent with scholarly research on the subject? Are there recent developments the article ignores? And so on.
  3. If you receive feedback, try to work with the other contributor to fix whatever problems the external article might have. If other contributors feel strongly that this article will be more trouble than it's worth, you should strongly consider not importing it.
  4. If you have waited a week and received no feedback, you have a choice. If, having mulled it over for a week, you still feel that the external article will be a valuable addition to Citizendium, do it. (It's not as though Citizendium articles are carved in stone or anything.) However, if you're still not sure, it never hurts to wait, and articles can stay on the Import page indefinitely.

It's important to emphasize that this is a optional, voluntary method to allow contributors to solicit feedback on external articles. Contributors are free to import articles from Wikipedia so long as they follow our guidelines on the matter.

Other helpful resources

This is our actual policy on external articles. It's worth emphasizing that few articles from open sources are up to Citizendium standards. Also note that your external article may be deleted if you do not expand or substantially modify it.

Wikipedia's guidelines for importing 1911 Britannica articles. Helpful, particularly as concerns the many biases and factual problems of the 1911 Britannica.


Nominated External Articles: Add your article down here

CZ:Import/Gesenius

  • As far as I can tell, this is a pretty solid article from the 1911 Britannica on an important early Semitic linguist. Brian P. Long 01:14, 11 August 2008 (CDT)