Gulf War (Iraq, 1991)/UNSC Resolutions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} ==Before the invasion of Kuwait== ==Before the coalition attack== ==After the cease-fire== *UNSCR on 687 (1991). Adopted on 3 April, the complex, nine-part resolution set term...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Before the invasion of Kuwait== | ==Before the invasion of Kuwait== | ||
==Before the coalition attack== | ==Before the coalition attack== | ||
*UNSC Resolution 660, 2 August 1990. Condemned the attack | |||
*UNSC Resolution 661, 6 August 1990. | |||
==After the cease-fire== | ==After the cease-fire== | ||
*UNSCR on 687 (1991). Adopted on 3 April, the complex, nine-part resolution set terms for a permanent cease-fire. Among other things, Iraq was called on to accept a 1963 border agreement with Kuwait, to agree to compensate Kuwait for damages it had caused during the occupation and to destroy weapons of mass destruction. A UN observer unit was to monitor a demilitarized zone along a boundary between Iraq and Kuwait. | *UNSCR on 687 (1991). Adopted on 3 April, the complex, nine-part resolution set terms for a permanent cease-fire. Among other things, Iraq was called on to accept a 1963 border agreement with Kuwait, to agree to compensate Kuwait for damages it had caused during the occupation and to destroy weapons of mass destruction. A UN observer unit was to monitor a demilitarized zone along a boundary between Iraq and Kuwait. |
Revision as of 22:56, 4 July 2008
Before the invasion of Kuwait
Before the coalition attack
- UNSC Resolution 660, 2 August 1990. Condemned the attack
- UNSC Resolution 661, 6 August 1990.
After the cease-fire
- UNSCR on 687 (1991). Adopted on 3 April, the complex, nine-part resolution set terms for a permanent cease-fire. Among other things, Iraq was called on to accept a 1963 border agreement with Kuwait, to agree to compensate Kuwait for damages it had caused during the occupation and to destroy weapons of mass destruction. A UN observer unit was to monitor a demilitarized zone along a boundary between Iraq and Kuwait.
Mr. Hussein called the text "unjust", alleged it comprised "iniquitous and vengeful measures", and constituted "an unprecedented assault" on the sovereignty and rights of his country.
The UN, he claimed, was applying a "double standard" to Iraq, in the form of "criteria of duality" in international relations. Nevertheless, he stated at the conclusion of his missive (S/22456) that Iraq "has no choice but to accept this resolution".
- Five days later on 11 April, Paul Noterdaeme of Belgium, President of the Security Council, formally acknowledged Iraq's acceptance--"irrevocable and without qualifying conditions"--of resolution 687, adding that Council members had asked him to note that conditions established in the resolution had been me
Categories:
- Subpages
- Military Extra Subpages
- History Extra Subpages
- Politics Extra Subpages
- Article specific subpage
- Generic subpage
- AS-UNSC Resolutions
- Military-AS-UNSC Resolutions
- History-AS-UNSC Resolutions
- Politics-AS-UNSC Resolutions
- Experimental subpage
- All Content
- Military Content
- History Content
- Politics Content
- Military tag
- History tag