Talk:History of music psychology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ulrich Terstiege
No edit summary
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(commenting on talk structure)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
 
==Structure of the talk==
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.


Line 12: Line 12:


[[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] 3 August 2008
[[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] 3 August 2008
:I would extend part I as you suggest, and shorten part II accordingly. Sachs is still widely cited as a fundamental contributor to the field of comparative musicology but he can't be considered as being prominent in current mainstream research. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 04:40, 4 September 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:40, 4 September 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Description of the historical development of research in music psychology. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Music, Psychology and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Structure of the talk

My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.

Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper by Leman and Schneider, and it includes a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. If time permits, I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention

  1. the work of von Helmholtz,
  2. Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion,
  3. the cognitive model of perception of music given by Knoblauch in 1888.

Part II discusses the content of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know?

Ulrich Terstiege 3 August 2008

I would extend part I as you suggest, and shorten part II accordingly. Sachs is still widely cited as a fundamental contributor to the field of comparative musicology but he can't be considered as being prominent in current mainstream research. Daniel Mietchen 04:40, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_music_psychology&oldid=498861"