Computer networking application protocols: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Meg Taylor
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
'''Computer networking application protocols''' travel over [[computer networking end-to-end protocols]] to provide services meaningful to [[application program]]s residing in the endpoints. The application protocols differ in the kind of information they transfer (e.g., self-contained messages, [[file transfer|computer file]]s, [[remote procedure call]]s, [[spoken language]], etc.).  Note well that these are not directly accessible to a human user. To draw an analogy to postal mail, a person can drop an envelope into a mailbox, but has no access either to the mechanism between mailbox and post office, or post office to post office.
'''Computer networking application protocols''' travel over [[computer networking end-to-end protocols]] to provide services meaningful to [[application program]]s residing in the endpoints. The application protocols differ in the kind of information they transfer (e.g., self-contained messages, [[file transfer|computer file]]s, [[remote procedure call]]s, [[spoken language]], etc.).  Note well that these are not directly accessible to a human user. To draw an analogy to postal mail, a person can drop an envelope into a mailbox, but has no access either to the mechanism between mailbox and post office, or post office to post office.



Revision as of 11:03, 30 March 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


Computer networking application protocols travel over computer networking end-to-end protocols to provide services meaningful to application programs residing in the endpoints. The application protocols differ in the kind of information they transfer (e.g., self-contained messages, computer files, remote procedure calls, spoken language, etc.). Note well that these are not directly accessible to a human user. To draw an analogy to postal mail, a person can drop an envelope into a mailbox, but has no access either to the mechanism between mailbox and post office, or post office to post office.

Application protocols also differ in their expectations of the performance end-to-end service below them. The application protocol may provide security, expect certain security services from the end-to-end or computer networking internetwork protocols over which they run, or both.

Classes of information transfer

Message

Messages are self-contained units of data, which may contain other types of data.

Message handling protocols are analogous to postal protocols. Different protocols run among mail clients that provide a human interface; message transfer agents analogous to post offices, possibly at multiple levels of a hierarchy; and message stores, analogous to temporary mailboxes.

The major IETF message transfer paradigms and protocols include:

See messaging application protocols for further detail

File

Files are sequences of units of data.

Structured data

Remote procedure calls

Character- or bit-oriented interaction

Directory services

Network management services

Expectations of the end-to-end service

Performance

They may be tolerant or intolerant of impairments such as:

  • Latency
  • Bit errors
  • Packet loss
  • Sequencing of packets

Security