Talk:Nova (astronomy): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Chris Day |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Test of name specificity== | ==Test of name specificity== | ||
<nowiki>{{r|Nova (astronomy)}}</nowiki> is seen as: {{r|Nova (astronomy)}} | |||
<nowiki>{{r|Nova (astronomy)|Nova}}</nowiki> is seen as: {{r|Nova (astronomy)|Nova}} | <nowiki>{{r|Nova (astronomy)|Nova}}</nowiki> is seen as: {{r|Nova (astronomy)|Nova}} | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 8 May 2008
I'm not sure about redirecting supernova here. Isn't there enough distinct information about this particular type of nova for a separate article? --Larry Sanger 14:28, 8 May 2008 (CDT)
- I would think so. We'll see this happen a lot at the beginning but I imagine we'll expand on these type of redirect with time. Note that in Related Atricles subpages supernova can exist with its own unique definition and it will be identified as a redirect due to the purple link. See example below using the {{r}} template (and thanks for improving the def):
- Supernova [r]: An astronomical object exploding to a brightness similar to that of an entire galaxy. Caused by a catastrophic explosion of either a white dwarf system or an aged star about five times the size of the sun, which occurs when the star collapses; a neutron star or a black hole may be formed as a result, or the explosion results in no remaining compact object. [e]
- Hopefully this distinct color will attract peoples attention to the fact that this article needs to be started when users browse the related articles subpages. Chris Day 14:38, 8 May 2008 (CDT)
Yes, exactly. It's a perfect example of a beneficial side-effect of better-coordinated information. --Larry Sanger 15:16, 8 May 2008 (CDT)
Test of name specificity
{{r|Nova (astronomy)}} is seen as:
- Nova (astronomy)
{{r|Nova (astronomy)|Nova}} is seen as:
- Nova