Talk:Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Why I upgraded status to 2: new section) |
imported>Robert W King |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I was in the midst of creating this article and had not yet created the Talk, the Related Articles, and the External Links subpages when the Metdata status was revised from my original 2 to a 3. Rome wasn't built in a day and it took me about 10-15 minutes to finish creating the article and its subpages. I firmly believe that it is now status 2 ... in my opinion there is not much more, if any, than can be written about an article on an engineering handbook. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:00, 29 February 2008 (CST) | I was in the midst of creating this article and had not yet created the Talk, the Related Articles, and the External Links subpages when the Metdata status was revised from my original 2 to a 3. Rome wasn't built in a day and it took me about 10-15 minutes to finish creating the article and its subpages. I firmly believe that it is now status 2 ... in my opinion there is not much more, if any, than can be written about an article on an engineering handbook. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:00, 29 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:Don't mind the number, I just usually put 3 for a lot of stuff. There's no need to justify the upgrade in status <code>;)</code> --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 17:12, 29 February 2008 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 17:12, 29 February 2008
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
Wikipedia has an article of the same title
I was the originator of the WP article and the major contributor. I have made a few changes before tranferring it here as a CZ article. - Milton Beychok 15:47, 29 February 2008 (CST)
Why I upgraded status to 2
I was in the midst of creating this article and had not yet created the Talk, the Related Articles, and the External Links subpages when the Metdata status was revised from my original 2 to a 3. Rome wasn't built in a day and it took me about 10-15 minutes to finish creating the article and its subpages. I firmly believe that it is now status 2 ... in my opinion there is not much more, if any, than can be written about an article on an engineering handbook. - Milton Beychok 16:00, 29 February 2008 (CST)
- Don't mind the number, I just usually put 3 for a lot of stuff. There's no need to justify the upgrade in status
;)
--Robert W King 17:12, 29 February 2008 (CST)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Chemistry Category Check
- Engineering Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developing Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag