Talk:Utility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (Article name) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Content== | |||
It seemed unfair to burden newcomers to economics with esoteric arguments about the metaphysical character of the concept of utility, so I have shifted them to the tutorials subpage for the benefit of pedants and economics students. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:25, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | It seemed unfair to burden newcomers to economics with esoteric arguments about the metaphysical character of the concept of utility, so I have shifted them to the tutorials subpage for the benefit of pedants and economics students. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:25, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
==Article name== | |||
I suspect that eventually we're likely to have other "Utility" pages (e.g. the notion of a public utility, i.e. light, water, etc) so maybe this would be better at [[Utility (economics)]]? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 18:07, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
[[Category:Rename suggested]] | |||
Revision as of 17:07, 10 April 2008
Content
It seemed unfair to burden newcomers to economics with esoteric arguments about the metaphysical character of the concept of utility, so I have shifted them to the tutorials subpage for the benefit of pedants and economics students. Nick Gardner 08:25, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
Article name
I suspect that eventually we're likely to have other "Utility" pages (e.g. the notion of a public utility, i.e. light, water, etc) so maybe this would be better at Utility (economics)? J. Noel Chiappa 18:07, 10 April 2008 (CDT)