Talk:Air Resources Laboratory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Milton Beychok m (Response) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST) | I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST) | ||
Thanks, Milton. Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken? Is it really close to approval? If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST) | :Thanks, Milton. Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken? Is it really close to approval? If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::Larry, first let me say that Stephen Ewen explained to me the intent of the Topic Informant Workgroup in a manner that I understood. I will comply with policy from now on. | |||
::As for this article, in my opinion, this article is about as far as I can take it and as far as it deserves to be taken. Regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 12:10, 3 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 12:10, 3 February 2008
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
My Wikipedian involvement in this article
I was not the original Wikipedian author of this article, but I revised and reformatted it heavily and expanded it by about 80 to 90 percent.
I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - Milton Beychok 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST)
- Thanks, Milton. Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken? Is it really close to approval? If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --Larry Sanger 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST)
- Larry, first let me say that Stephen Ewen explained to me the intent of the Topic Informant Workgroup in a manner that I understood. I will comply with policy from now on.
- As for this article, in my opinion, this article is about as far as I can take it and as far as it deserves to be taken. Regards, Milton Beychok 12:10, 3 February 2008 (CST)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Engineering Category Check
- Earth Sciences Category Check
- Topic Informant Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Developed Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Developed Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Developed Articles
- Topic Informant Advanced Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag