Talk:Schema theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen mNo edit summary |
imported>Douglas Holton (schema theory) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is minor adaptation from the addendum of a grad school paper of mine (grade: "A+"), but it should provide an acceptable starting point for a full article. I want to quick add that this is a major theory in its fields that happens to lack a WP article. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:22, 10 January 2008 (CST) | This is minor adaptation from the addendum of a grad school paper of mine (grade: "A+"), but it should provide an acceptable starting point for a full article. I want to quick add that this is a major theory in its fields that happens to lack a WP article. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:22, 10 January 2008 (CST) | ||
:There's an article but it's not very good ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema_(psychology) Schema_(psychology)]) This is usually referred to as schemA theory, not schemE theory. A good, recent article on it is this one: [http://intl-rer.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/75/4/531 Schema Theory Revisited] (McVee, 2005), but the full text is not freely accessible. [[User:Douglas Holton|Douglas Holton]] 11:25, 30 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 11:25, 30 January 2008
This is minor adaptation from the addendum of a grad school paper of mine (grade: "A+"), but it should provide an acceptable starting point for a full article. I want to quick add that this is a major theory in its fields that happens to lack a WP article. Stephen Ewen 03:22, 10 January 2008 (CST)
- There's an article but it's not very good (Schema_(psychology)) This is usually referred to as schemA theory, not schemE theory. A good, recent article on it is this one: Schema Theory Revisited (McVee, 2005), but the full text is not freely accessible. Douglas Holton 11:25, 30 January 2008 (CST)