Talk:Florida, history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Donald Albury
(→‎Move: prefer 'History of ...')
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
Line 6: Line 6:


::I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
::I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
:::Well, we've already got (e.g.) [[North Carolina, history]], [[California, history to 1845]], and [[California, history to 1846]], so if the title of this article is to be changed, several others will have to be changed too.  [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 11:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:43, 29 September 2008


Move

Comma-itis is what we have here. Should be History of Florida -Tom Morris 09:20, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

Or Florida (history)? Chris Day 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- Donald Albury 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
Well, we've already got (e.g.) North Carolina, history, California, history to 1845, and California, history to 1846, so if the title of this article is to be changed, several others will have to be changed too. Bruce M.Tindall 11:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)