Talk:Florida, history: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (→Move) |
imported>Donald Albury (→Move: prefer 'History of ...') |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Or [[Florida (history)]]? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT) | :Or [[Florida (history)]]? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
::I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 09:25, 29 September 2008
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There is no Metadata template or article page associated with this subpage.
|
Move
Comma-itis is what we have here. Should be History of Florida -Tom Morris 09:20, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
- Or Florida (history)? Chris Day 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
- I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- Donald Albury 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)