Talk:Metaphor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
imported>Brian P. Long (→Jakobson: new section) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I find the Intro to [[Metaphor]] a bit too abbreviated. I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor. Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first. Personal opinions. --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | I find the Intro to [[Metaphor]] a bit too abbreviated. I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor. Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first. Personal opinions. --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Jakobson == | |||
It seems to me that any discussion of metaphor really should include a discussion of the rather specialized way in which Roman Jakobson talks about metaphor (in opposition to metonymy). Not that I'm really qualified to do so, of course... | |||
I just looked at the WP metaphor article, and they don't have any discussion of Jakobson either. If we did it, it would be one way our article could be made more useful than WP's. | |||
[[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 04:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:12, 15 August 2009
Intoduction
I find the Intro to Metaphor a bit too abbreviated. I'd like it if it explained more, perhaps exemplified, and if it introduced the broader context of metaphor. Perhaps it needs to wait for the article to develop first. Personal opinions. --Anthony.Sebastian 03:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Jakobson
It seems to me that any discussion of metaphor really should include a discussion of the rather specialized way in which Roman Jakobson talks about metaphor (in opposition to metonymy). Not that I'm really qualified to do so, of course...
I just looked at the WP metaphor article, and they don't have any discussion of Jakobson either. If we did it, it would be one way our article could be made more useful than WP's.
Brian P. Long 04:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Linguistics Category Check
- Biology Category Check
- Literature Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Linguistics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles