CZ Talk:Core Articles/Social Sciences: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joshua M. Jensen (noted that I changed ling. to stage 3) |
imported>John Stephenson (We now have 99 articles - last call for changes) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:By the way, I just changed Linguistics to Stage 3. There's no question in my mind that it meets the definition of "most or all". [[User:Joshua M. Jensen|Joshua M. Jensen]] 09:39, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | :By the way, I just changed Linguistics to Stage 3. There's no question in my mind that it meets the definition of "most or all". [[User:Joshua M. Jensen|Joshua M. Jensen]] 09:39, 27 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I have removed the above links. Unless others wish to get involved - I'll put a last call out - it would be okay for Chris Day to consider locking the page. | |||
::I'm sure we've missed things out, though, or could argue forever about the 99... [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 00:04, 29 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:04, 28 October 2007
Which to boot out? (Linguistics)
As you can see, as of 27th October there are 5 too many in the linguistics lists. Which should be rejected? I think that individual languages and language families are less important, unless for some reason they are notable. I propose removing:
- Austro-Asiatic languages (1)
- Austronesian languages (1)
- Niger-Congo languages (1)
- Nilo-Saharan languages (1)
- Trans-New Guinea languages (1)
What do you think? Individual languages that I added I did so because they are widely spoken (e.g. Bengali and Javanese). John Stephenson 08:16, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, I added the language families using size as a criterion (i.e., number of languages in family), but I agree that a lot of them should go. Good call. I'm really glad that we've got a full list now! Joshua M. Jensen 09:37, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
- By the way, I just changed Linguistics to Stage 3. There's no question in my mind that it meets the definition of "most or all". Joshua M. Jensen 09:39, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
- I have removed the above links. Unless others wish to get involved - I'll put a last call out - it would be okay for Chris Day to consider locking the page.
- I'm sure we've missed things out, though, or could argue forever about the 99... John Stephenson 00:04, 29 October 2007 (CDT)