Engineering/Approval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (use approval page to document approvals) |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
As discussd on the talk page this article is not considered to be ready for approval: | As discussd on the talk page this article is not considered to be ready for approval: | ||
:"''There are two completely empty subsections, at least one of which ought to be filled out. | :"''There are two completely empty subsections, at least one of which ought to be filled out. '''Problem identification'''. '''Tools''' isn't as important, though '''computer use''' is logically | ||
'''Problem identification'''. '''Tools''' isn't as important, though '''computer use''' is logically | subordinate to it. '''Engineering in a social context''' needs expansion. '''Cultural presence''' has some issues which need to be addressed.''" quote from Anthony Argyriou | ||
subordinate to it. '''Engineering in a social context''' needs expansion. '''Cultural presence''' | |||
has some issues which need to be addressed.''" quote from Anthony Argyriou | |||
Revision as of 03:09, 5 October 2007
| Jochen Wendebaum nominated the version dated 01:59, 10 July 2007 (CDT) of this article for approval. The Engineering Workgroup oversaw this approval. The ToApprove template was removed by Anthony Argyriou. |
As discussd on the talk page this article is not considered to be ready for approval:
- "There are two completely empty subsections, at least one of which ought to be filled out. Problem identification. Tools isn't as important, though computer use is logically
subordinate to it. Engineering in a social context needs expansion. Cultural presence has some issues which need to be addressed." quote from Anthony Argyriou