Talk:Ham (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (hogs vs. pigs) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Hogs and pigs: riding off on my Hog, I'll let you do whatever you like while I chomp on a ham-on-rye with lotsa Mayo....) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Hogs and pigs== | ==Hogs and pigs== | ||
Is it worth describing ham as meat processed from 'hogs'? We never use 'hog' in UK English so I think it could be confusing. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 22:27, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | Is it worth describing ham as meat processed from 'hogs'? We never use 'hog' in UK English so I think it could be confusing. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 22:27, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:"Hog" seems to be the general U.S. technical term for "pig" in articles about such things as making ham. I didn't know it wasn't used in the U.K. Everyone understands "pig", so do whatever you think is necessary. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 22:32, 26 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:32, 26 September 2007
Move
I think that by default we think of the meat first and foremost. I recommend moving this to ham (disambiguation), and having Ham as the real meat of the term. John Stephenson 21:28, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
Hogs and pigs
Is it worth describing ham as meat processed from 'hogs'? We never use 'hog' in UK English so I think it could be confusing. John Stephenson 22:27, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
- "Hog" seems to be the general U.S. technical term for "pig" in articles about such things as making ham. I didn't know it wasn't used in the U.K. Everyone understands "pig", so do whatever you think is necessary. Hayford Peirce 22:32, 26 September 2007 (CDT)