CZ:Subpages/Which style?: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
* The main considerations here are design/aesthetic ones.
* The main considerations here are design/aesthetic ones.


= VOTE HERE =
{{col-begin}}
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
{{col-break}}

Revision as of 06:16, 17 August 2007


The issue

Should we use vertical (column-based) or horizontal (tab-based) templates for subpages? Examples below. The templates used, in case you're interested, are {{subpages4}} and {{subpages9}} (note, not for the faint of heart!).

Brief summary of arguments

For a vertical template: nicely balances out the links on the left side and top of the usual MediaWiki layout (skin).

Against a vertical template: creates layout problems, especially with images, which are usually placed in the top right, where the vertical template would go.

For a horizontal template: tabs are a common, instantly recognizable navigation tool.

Against a horizontal template: this creates "link overload" and "tab overload" at the top of the page.

Notes:

  • The functionality of the subpages can be made exactly the same.
  • The main considerations here are design/aesthetic ones.

VOTE HERE

Vertical, or Column-based (Example)

  1. Larry Sanger

Horizontal, or Tab-based (Example)