Conservapedia

Conservapedia is an internet encyclopedia project that attempts to present information from a conservative and pro-American viewpoint.

It is a wiki project using the same Mediawiki software as Citizendium and Wikipedia; the site has set itself up in opposition particularly to Wikipedia and its perceived "liberal bias". It was founded in November, 2006, by Andrew Schlafly, son of conservative commentator Phyllis Schlafly, and originally began as a class project by homeschooled students. As of October, 2008, it had about 26,000 articles.

Editorial policy

Conservapedia aims to help learners discover the truth, and so it exalts certain viewpoints and principles in accordance with its Christian-friendly, US Conservative viewpoint. Alternate ideas may be described, but not presented as truth.

In particular, Conservapedia disputes the mainstream of academic and political thought on evolution and homosexuality. In its first year, the evolution article was heavily biased towards a Young Earth creationism perspective, but that has shifted as Old Earth creationists have come on board. Its stance against homosexuality is based on a Christian perspective shared by senior administrators: i.e, it is immoral and unhealthy.

Conservapedia has had a rocky relationship with people who disagree with its viewpoints, philosophy and policies. After a spring and summer of Conservapedia trying to "engage the opposition", project critics/opponents created the rival Rational Wiki to coordinate their efforts.

Recruiting of new writers has been slow, with hundreds of new user accounts being created each week and all but a handful promptly banned as sockpuppets.

As at Wikipedia, all contributors can freely edit articles unless the page has been protected, and anonymity is permitted. In line with its religious and Christian theme, Conservapedia's editorial policy consists of "Commandments", a reference to the two sets of laws the Bible says were handed down to Moses from God. The Commandments require, among others, that "everything... be true and verifiable" and also enforce a family-friendly policy. Until March, 2007, Conservapedia required by Commandment that "As much as possible, American spelling of words must be used", but now the site's "Manual of Style" presents American spellings as being preferred, with Commonwealth spellings possible depending on the context.

Conservapedia administrators frequently have to block vandals attempting to insert inappropriate material.

Liberal commentators have made fun of the obsession of Conservapedia readers with homosexuality, as well as the entries on creation science. In its first year, Young Earth creationism held sway, but now Old Earth creationism is an equal partner.

Positions

The ideological views of the authors stand out quite strongly on Conservapedia and can be characterized as follows: the authors of Conservapedia are Christian, usually of a Biblically literalist position, usually a creationist (including both young- and old-earth creationist, and supporters of intelligent design theory. Politically, Conservapedia takes a position that is anti-abortion, for capital punishment, against homosexuality, against gun control, against Medicare and state-funded health services, anti-vaccination, against what they described as "professorial values" (following the line given by other right-wing critics of academia including David Horowitz), against the minimum wage, broadly against what they deem left-wing economic values and many liberal social values. They are strongly for home schooling, and generally hold to a neoliberal, laissez faire economic position.

Differences from Wikipedia and Citizendium

Both Wikipedia and Citizendium are attempting to produce an online wiki-based encyclopedia that presents viewpoints that are broadly neutral, and to cover controversies and differences of opinions fairly and equally. Conservapedia maintains a list of differences from Wikipedia. Some of the key differences are:

• Conservapedia publishes study guides and lectures. This stems from Conservapedia's origins as a home-schooling resource. The Wikimedia Foundation publishes similar material through the Wikibooks and Wikiversity projects, and the Citizendium allows study guides and other educational resources to be published as subpages.
• Conservapedia does not have a neutrality policy and does not attempt to use neutral language - the example it gives is the use of the loaded word 'terrorist' rather than the supposedly neutral word 'militant'.
• Unlike Wikipedia, but like the Citizendium, Conservapedia maintains a family-friendly policy. The RationalWiki website states that a link to "The Silent Scream", a video showing the ultrasound footage of an abortion at eleven weeks produced by pro-life activists, is an example of a violation of the family friendly policy.
• Wikipedia allows edits from users who are not logged in. Conservapedia requires people be logged in to edit and that the account they use not have an "anti-intellectual" username. The Citizendium requires that editors be logged in with their real name (with a very small number of exceptions).
• Both Conservapedia and the Citizendium claim to want to value experts by not "pretending that some random anonymous user who just signed up is as knowledgeable and authoritative as a scholar with decades of experience in teaching or research". The founder of the Citizendium has a similar policy in place because of a perceived deficit of respect given to experts on Wikipedia.
• Wikipedia operates a strict "no original research" policy. Conservapedia does not have this policy, and allows posting of material that matches the views and ideology of the site. The Citizendium also allows some original research to be published, through both the Topic Informants Workgroup and through Signed Articles by experts.