CZ Talk:Subpages: Difference between revisions
imported>James A. Flippin (Purpose?) |
imported>Stephen Ewen (→Purpose?: Reply to James A. Flippin) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
I can't see how, aside from perhaps the debate and news guides and invited articles this whole subpage thing will be helpful. Is there an essential difference from including the bibliography in the article, aside from fragmenting the information? I don't particularly relish the thought of moving back and forth between subpages to read referenced material or see pictures. I'd rather just scroll through a well-organized collection of information. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 01:28, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | I can't see how, aside from perhaps the debate and news guides and invited articles this whole subpage thing will be helpful. Is there an essential difference from including the bibliography in the article, aside from fragmenting the information? I don't particularly relish the thought of moving back and forth between subpages to read referenced material or see pictures. I'd rather just scroll through a well-organized collection of information. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 01:28, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:As I understand it, the ''references'' section in articles will stay; the ''bibliography'' subpage will be different, a collection of great sources for further reading on the subject. If I am mistaken, if it removes all references to a subpage, I very much agree with you. It would be needless and very frustrating fragmentation, akin to the frustration of reading a book with all its references in the back rather than at the bottom of the page...constantly, constantly, constantly having to flip between the text and the references cited. | |||
:Regarding the Gallery, I understand the same principle will operate. The gallery will be ''additional'' photos not contained in the text, a "pictorial article" of sorts, ideally. For an example, see [[Onslow Beach]] and click on the gallery link. | |||
One issue going on right now is the placement of the subpage links/box. See http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1059.0.html if you wish to see various examples and give your opinion on the matter. | |||
: —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 02:48, 9 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:48, 9 July 2007
Invited, Signed Articles
I presume invitations can go to CZ non-members, Albert Gore, say. --Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 17:55, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
Right. --Larry Sanger 10:16, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
For students
Could we provide another version of the main article targeting Middle--to--High-School, or even younger depending on article? --Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 17:58, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
Yes, we could. Good idea; it's technically feasible to start up both "expert" and "middle-school" level articles. --Larry Sanger 10:16, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
Earlier nominations
Nominated articles
Anybody can nominate an article here
Yea
Nay
Yea
Nay
Yea
nay
- Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) (needs work}
Yea
Nay
Yea
Nay
Purpose?
I can't see how, aside from perhaps the debate and news guides and invited articles this whole subpage thing will be helpful. Is there an essential difference from including the bibliography in the article, aside from fragmenting the information? I don't particularly relish the thought of moving back and forth between subpages to read referenced material or see pictures. I'd rather just scroll through a well-organized collection of information. James A. Flippin 01:28, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- As I understand it, the references section in articles will stay; the bibliography subpage will be different, a collection of great sources for further reading on the subject. If I am mistaken, if it removes all references to a subpage, I very much agree with you. It would be needless and very frustrating fragmentation, akin to the frustration of reading a book with all its references in the back rather than at the bottom of the page...constantly, constantly, constantly having to flip between the text and the references cited.
- Regarding the Gallery, I understand the same principle will operate. The gallery will be additional photos not contained in the text, a "pictorial article" of sorts, ideally. For an example, see Onslow Beach and click on the gallery link.
One issue going on right now is the placement of the subpage links/box. See http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1059.0.html if you wish to see various examples and give your opinion on the matter.
- —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 02:48, 9 July 2007 (CDT)