Talk:Gymnastics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>D. Matt Innis (that should teach you) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::Okay, okay, but it's at least as good as [http://zero.newassignment.net/user/rwilliamking#profile-1 this one ;-)] I'll keep my Nadia picture then, hehe. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 14:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | :::Okay, okay, but it's at least as good as [http://zero.newassignment.net/user/rwilliamking#profile-1 this one ;-)] I'll keep my Nadia picture then, hehe. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 14:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::::Matt's sword striketh deeply and unkindly; I am slain.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:11, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | ::::Matt's sword striketh deeply and unkindly; I am slain.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 15:11, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::::Aw shucks, now I feel bad, I taketh it backeth. But you musteth watcheth your forketh tongue. :))) --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 15:14, 11 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:14, 11 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Sports Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Not specified |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Matt Innis (Talk) 15:08, 11 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I just have to go now, but I will expand it. Jordan Goldberg 06:06, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
I need an example of combinations getting bonus points or tricks elevated in level. I added a section on vocabulary and tried to define "trick." I also added 2 helpful links. Tom Kelly 14:24, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
We do have a picture of Nadia --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:30, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- What is the resolution of that picture? Is there somewhere where that is listed? I don't actually know much about resolution and megapixels, etc. To say it bluntly, is the picture too blurry? Tom Kelly 14:38, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- It looks like it was enlarged from the original source. There's a fair amount of noise, some image resolution loss, a little bit of jpeg artifacting. It's usable but I wouldn't consider it "great".--Robert W King 14:44, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Additionally I just saw that it comes from a collection of photos from the 1970s so it may be the best you can get unless you can get a scan from an original publication around that date. Otherwise, it's a digital duplication of the available photo technology at the time.--Robert W King 14:47, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Okay, okay, but it's at least as good as this one ;-) I'll keep my Nadia picture then, hehe. --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Matt's sword striketh deeply and unkindly; I am slain.--Robert W King 15:11, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Aw shucks, now I feel bad, I taketh it backeth. But you musteth watcheth your forketh tongue. :))) --Matt Innis (Talk) 15:14, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Matt's sword striketh deeply and unkindly; I am slain.--Robert W King 15:11, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- Okay, okay, but it's at least as good as this one ;-) I'll keep my Nadia picture then, hehe. --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Sports Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Sports Advanced Articles
- Sports Nonstub Articles
- Sports Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Sports Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Sports Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Sports Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Sports External Articles
- Sports Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Sports Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup