Talk:Russian Liberation Army: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
imported>Hayford Peirce |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::I'm completely replacing the 2007 content. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | ::I'm completely replacing the 2007 content. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Bob Willis (are you sure it isn't Bob Wills [Is Still the King])? == | |||
That's a *very* interesting monograph, although he is far from being a Wordsmith, that's fer sure! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 02:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:55, 6 March 2010
Rewrite needed
This does not read like an encyclopedic article. Rather it reads like an argument about the pro's and con's of fighting for or against the Nazi's. The "rationale" for why someone might fight for the RLM is apart from the history of the RLM. Would the author like me to try my hand? Will Nesbitt 06:18, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- I have been meaning to do something about this. I am preparing a lecture on the topic, so maybe I should write a more straightforward encyclopedic article. --Morten Juhl Johansen 01:20, 16 November 2007 (CST)
- I'm completely replacing the 2007 content. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Bob Willis (are you sure it isn't Bob Wills [Is Still the King])?
That's a *very* interesting monograph, although he is far from being a Wordsmith, that's fer sure! Hayford Peirce 02:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)