Talk:Greatest common divisor: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Subpage "Examples" or "Tutorial"?: new section) |
imported>Peter Schmitt |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The detailed examples should go on a subpage (Example, Tutorial?). | The detailed examples should go on a subpage (Example, Tutorial?). | ||
Or is this what is meant by "Student level"? Then the name is a bad choice (at least for mathematics). | Or is this what is meant by "Student level"? Then the name is a bad choice (at least for mathematics). | ||
[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I just saw that there is a "Tutorials" subpage. That seems to fit in this case. In other cases "Example(s)" would be better. [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:53, 29 June 2009
Example is redundant
Oops, maybe I shouldn't have put in an example of Euclid's algorithm, since such an example is already given on the Euclid's algorithm page. --Catherine Woodgold 08:38, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
Why so complicate?
So for the gcd you have take take the smallest exponents: :
lcm is similar: You have to take the gratest exponents: :
--arbol01 19:01, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
- That's what the article says. Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? Michael Hardy 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
highest common factor?
In number theory, I never read the term "highest common factor", but my Oxford dictionary and google seem to know it quite well. Is this perhaps a term used at school level? Peter Schmitt 23:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Subpage "Examples" or "Tutorial"?
The detailed examples should go on a subpage (Example, Tutorial?). Or is this what is meant by "Student level"? Then the name is a bad choice (at least for mathematics). Peter Schmitt 23:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just saw that there is a "Tutorials" subpage. That seems to fit in this case. In other cases "Example(s)" would be better. Peter Schmitt 23:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)