Talk:Greatest common divisor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Karsten Meyer
No edit summary
imported>Michael Hardy
Line 26: Line 26:


--[[User:Karsten Meyer|arbol01]] 19:01, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
--[[User:Karsten Meyer|arbol01]] 19:01, 15 July 2007 (CDT)
: That's what the article says.  Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:38, 16 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Greatest common divisor"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Catherine Woodgold

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Example is redundant

Oops, maybe I shouldn't have put in an example of Euclid's algorithm, since such an example is already given on the Euclid's algorithm page. --Catherine Woodgold 08:38, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

Why so complicate?

So for the gcd you have take take the smallest exponents: :

lcm is similar: You have to take the gratest exponents: :

--arbol01 19:01, 15 July 2007 (CDT)

That's what the article says. Are you suggesting that there's some difference between what you wrote above and what the article says? Michael Hardy 09:38, 16 July 2007 (CDT)