Talk:Winston Churchill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (Please explain reverts more completely, gentlemen) |
imported>Richard Jensen (illegal to do anything) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Please explain your reverts. We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation. See [[CZ:Professionalism#Reversion_and_deletion_as_unprofessional_behaviors|this section of CZ:Professionalism]], please. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT) | Please explain your reverts. We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation. See [[CZ:Professionalism#Reversion_and_deletion_as_unprofessional_behaviors|this section of CZ:Professionalism]], please. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::we seem to have a philosophical dilemma. It is illegal to erase text but also illegal to restore it. (In this case I DID provide an explanation in the Summary line)> [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] |
Revision as of 12:42, 14 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 13:01, 5 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Lead image
I think the article needs an image in the lead section, to show how Winston Churchill looks like. However, I have not found any copyright-free picture yet. If anyone does find such an image, please add onto the article, thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 17:38, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
Please explain reverts
Please explain your reverts. We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation. See this section of CZ:Professionalism, please. --Larry Sanger 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
- we seem to have a philosophical dilemma. It is illegal to erase text but also illegal to restore it. (In this case I DID provide an explanation in the Summary line)> Richard Jensen
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Politics Cleanup
- Cleanup