Talk:Observable (quantum computation): Difference between revisions
imported>Greg Woodhouse (Ambiguous language) |
imported>Greg Woodhouse (Quantum mechanics or quantum computation?) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
In the section titled Algebra, we find the following: "A physical system is described by its static constitution, dynamics and expectation function. These three ... may be used to calculate the outcome of particular experiments or computations." This language can at least be interpreted as implying the experiments and computations are the same thing. Is that intended? [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 10:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | In the section titled Algebra, we find the following: "A physical system is described by its static constitution, dynamics and expectation function. These three ... may be used to calculate the outcome of particular experiments or computations." This language can at least be interpreted as implying the experiments and computations are the same thing. Is that intended? [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 10:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Quantum mechanics or quantum computation? == | |||
A more basic issue is that this entire article is framed in terms of quantum computation (for example, noting that David Deutsch uses the MWI, but failing to it was introduced(?) by David Bohm). The article may be intended to provide background material for quantum computation, but is of more general significance, and should be written in the wider context of quantum theory. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 10:35, 30 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 09:35, 30 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Physics Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Charles Blackham 10:52, 22 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Ambiguous language
In the section titled Algebra, we find the following: "A physical system is described by its static constitution, dynamics and expectation function. These three ... may be used to calculate the outcome of particular experiments or computations." This language can at least be interpreted as implying the experiments and computations are the same thing. Is that intended? Greg Woodhouse 10:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
Quantum mechanics or quantum computation?
A more basic issue is that this entire article is framed in terms of quantum computation (for example, noting that David Deutsch uses the MWI, but failing to it was introduced(?) by David Bohm). The article may be intended to provide background material for quantum computation, but is of more general significance, and should be written in the wider context of quantum theory. Greg Woodhouse 10:35, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- Physics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Mathematics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Physics External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Physics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Mathematics Cleanup
- Cleanup