Ebrahim Baronets: Difference between revisions
imported>Raveem Tahir (/* Sir (Fazulbhoy<ref>Page 570. ''Negotiating the Lucknow Pact'', Hugh F. Owen, ''The Journal of Asian Studies'', Vol. 31, No. 3. (May, 1972), pp. 561-587. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici) |
imported>Raveem Tahir |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The first trustees included the first baronet and three officials of the Government of Bombay<ref name = lawsuit />. | The first trustees included the first baronet and three officials of the Government of Bombay<ref name = lawsuit />. | ||
The Ebrahim baronetcy remains the only [[British]] [[hereditary title]] created for a [[Muslim]] (other Muslims with hereditary titles such as [[Baron Headley]] have been converts). | |||
==Incumbents== | ==Incumbents== | ||
Revision as of 11:38, 21 April 2007
(Currimbhoy) Ebrahim baronets of Pabaney Villa (India, 1911)
The Ebrahim Baronetcy of Pabaney Villa was created in the Baronetage of Great Britain and Ireland on July the 21st, 1911 for Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim. King George V issued Letters Patent conferring the "dignity, state and degree" of a Baronet on Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim of Bombay and to "the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten and to be begotten"[2].
In order to provide for the upkeep and dignity of the Baronetey, the then Governor General of India in Council enacted the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Act, 1913. By this, considerable properties belonging to Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim were settled upon the trustee to support the dignity of the hereditary title for the first baronet and his heirs, following the precedent set by the Cowasji Jehangir Baronetcy Act of 1911[3]. The first trustees included the first baronet and three officials of the Government of Bombay[2].
The Ebrahim baronetcy remains the only British hereditary title created for a Muslim (other Muslims with hereditary titles such as Baron Headley have been converts).
Incumbents
Sir (Fazulbhoy[4]) Currimbhoy Ebrahim, 1st baronet
Currimbhoy Ebrahim, a Muslim, was born an Dawoodi Ismaili Bohra[5] on the 21st of October, 1840[6]. He went to Hong Kong in 1856 and set up E. Paaney & Co. in 1857 at age 17. He became a freemason of a Bombay Lodge[7] and an industrialist with mercantile business in Bombay and Calcutta (India), Hongkong and Shanghai (China) and at Kobe (Japan)[1]. He was knighted after a donation of 300,000 rupees for a museum commemorating a visit by the Prince of Wales and a contribution towards a statue of the Prince in Bombay[8]. Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim was created a baronet on the 21st of July, 1911 and died on the 29th of May, 1924[2]. Clause 21 of his will stated: "Lastly it is my special desire that my son Mohamedbhoy on succeeding to the title of Baronet and every succeeding Baronet shall forthwith on such succession adopt the names of Currimbhoy Ebrahim and continue to do so as long as he holds the title."[2], thus making the holders commonly referred to as the Currimbhoy Ebrahim baronets, similar to the Readymoney and Jeejebhoy baronets. He had had at least one other son (Ismail) apart from his heir Mahomedbhoy[2].
Sir Mahomedbhoy Currimbhoy Ebrahim, 2nd baronet
Born on the 11th of September, 1867 and succeeded to the title on the 26th of September, 1924[6]. He owned roughly fifteen percent of the Bombay cotton mill industry in 1933[9]. Died on the 31st of March, 1928[2].
Sir Huseinlali (or Hussainbhoy[2]) Currimbhoy Ebrahim, 3rd baronet
Born on the 13th of April, 1903. Succeeded to the title on the 3rd of March, 1928. He migrated to Pakistan some time between 1947 and September, 1949 and was declared an evacuee under the new Bombay Evacuees Act in the same year[2]. Died on the 4th of March, 1952, aged 48[6]. Apart from his heir. his wife, Lady Amine Currimbhoy Ebrahim, and two daughters (Munira Fazal Chinoy and Mumtaz Mohamed Rahimtoola) survived him[2].
Sir Mahomed (Fazalbhoy[2]) Currimbhoy Ebrahim, 4th baronet
Born on the 24th of June, 1935. Succeeded to the title on the 4th of March, 1952. Current incumbent[6].
Heir apparent
The heir apparent is Zoolfikar Ali (?-)[2].
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 http://www.harappa.com/photo2/bo3.html
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Supreme Court of India, 1978, Fazalbhoy Currimbhoy etc v. official trustee of Maharashtra & ors, etc [1978] INSC 254; [1979] 2 SCR 699; [1979] 3 SCC 189; AIR 1979 SC 687 (12 December 1978) http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/CommonLII/INSC/1978/254.html
- ↑ Page 7. British India (in Review of Legislation, 1913; British Empire), Courtenay Ilbert, Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, New Ser., Vol. 15. (1915), pp. 7-13. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1479-5973%281915%292%3A15%3C7%3ABI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O
- ↑ Page 570. Negotiating the Lucknow Pact, Hugh F. Owen, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3. (May, 1972), pp. 561-587. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9118%28197205%2931%3A3%3C561%3ANTLP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J
- ↑ Page 423. South Asian Muslims in Hong Kong: Creation of a 'Local Boy' Identity, Anita M. Weiss, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3. (Jul., 1991), pp. 417-453. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-749X%28199107%2925%3A3%3C417%3ASAMIHK%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage/baronetse.htm
- ↑ History of Scottish Freemasonry in India: 1838 - 2001, http://www.geocities.com/dglindia/hist1.htm
- ↑ Page 163. Indian Millowners and Indian Nationalism before 1914, A. P. Kannangara, Past and Present, No. 40. (Jul., 1968), pp. 147-164. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-2746%28196807%290%3A40%3C147%3AIMAINB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8
- ↑ Page 643. Industrialization in India before 1947: Conventional Approaches and Alternative Perspectives, Rajnarayan Chandavarkar, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3, Special Issue: Papers Presented at the Conference on Indian Economic and Social History, Cambridge University, April 1984. (1985), pp. 623-668. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-749X%281985%2919%3A3%3C623%3AIIIB1C%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G