Talk:Sport

I just began a writing on this. I plan on expanding. It's such a broad topic that any comments on a focus for the article would be appreciated. History? Should I list professional sports organizations? Mention of the Olympic games? Pop culture tie in? A lot of places to go. David Martin 20:32, 12 April 2007 (CDT)

I just saw the edit that included the three tennis players as a subcategory of tennis. Do you think this is appropriately placed? If we were to follow this, then there would be literally thousands of players listed on this page. It just seems like it doesn't belong. David Martin 19:29, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

I agree. I think it's fine to have a list of sports-which likely will become its own linked article (catalog). But, hard as it is, this article should be a narrative that introduces the topic, like Biology or Literature.Nancy Sculerati 19:35, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

I appreciate your concerns and thought about them before doing it. However, at the moment there is almost literally nothing in CZ about sports and any of the more prominent athletes. Until I put in a long article about tennis a couple of days ago, there was only a single brief paragraph about it. Right now I think it's useful for new visitors to these pages to be able to click on a header such as Sports (on the Home page) and then see that there actually is some content here. For instance, I think it would be useful for the baseball Header to have Cobb, Ruth, Mays, Bonds, etc. beneath it. Maybe when the tennis list reaches 20 or 30 or 40 or some other number the listing should be discontinued. In the meantime I don't see that it's hurting anything and may actually be useful.... Hayford Peirce 19:41, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

If you look at the list now, you will see that I have come up with what is probably a better solution, one that will certainly work better in the long run, when, hopefully, there will be many, many individual entries for this list. The same thing would also work, of course, for other sports, ie, Prominent Baseball Players. I hope that you find this satisfactory. Hayford Peirce 10:11, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

sports article first para

I have no strong feelings about this, but as a guy who has partipated for many years first in organized sports (tennis tournaments), then me-vs.-him sports (tennis matches at the club against other people, including my wife), and then, finally, non-competitive, except, maybe against the clock, stuff such as running (jogging) three or four miles a night in the Tucson foothills, it seems to me that Sports shouldn't be defined strictly as something in which there are winners and losers and real rules. I've played 3-hour, 3-set tennis matches in tournaments, in which, at the end, I was nowhere near exhausted as I have been after a 30-minute, 3.3-mile jog chez moi. What I was doing then in my jogging that wasn't a sport? Hayford Peirce 22:31, 5 August 2008 (CDT)

• The definition of sports has many different meanings for different cultures. A whole section devoted to it's etymology is what I'd suggest. --Charles Sandberg 22:55, 5 August 2008 (CDT)

Thanks

Thanks to everyone for contributing to this article lately. The experiment seems a success so far, but I really hope we'll be expanding this by ten times today. We'll see!  :-) And by the way, just so it's clear...by no means is this to be regarded as my article or in any way under my special care. This is a collaboration, as all CZ articles should be. --Larry Sanger 07:42, 6 August 2008 (CDT)

Nascar

Hey, I hate to throw in the controversy, but being from the south USA, do we consider my Nascar a sport?! I know the fans aren't really into exercise, but they do buy a lot of beer :-) D. Matt Innis 08:45, 6 August 2008 (CDT)