Talk:Hydrogen bond: Difference between revisions
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Article checklist) |
imported>Paul Wormer (Advanced theory) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 17:30, 7 April 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 17:30, 7 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Advanced theory == | |||
Today I started as a fresh Citizendium author, but with a fair amount of Wikipedia experience. | |||
I see that the section '''Advanced theory''' in this article is equal to what the corresponding section in the Wikipedia article was before I changed it. I don't want to change it again here without consultation. You can see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_bond#Advanced_theory_of_the_hydrogen_bond here] | |||
how I changed it in Wikipedia. | |||
My objections were: (i) I don't agree that hydrogen bond is mysterious. (ii) I don't know what a metric dependent scalar field is between bonds and hence I cannot understand how it can explain bonding. (iii) It escapes me why it is stated that hydrogen is a bound state phenomenon. For low enough temperatures all molecular complexes are bound, even He<sub>2</sub>. | |||
Are there any objections to me transferring [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_bond#Advanced_theory_of_the_hydrogen_bond this] to the present article? Or, could someone elaborate/clarify the advanced theory section, so that I can at least understand it and preferably agree with it? [[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:00, 17 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 03:00, 17 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Chemistry Workgroup, Physics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 17:30, 7 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Advanced theory
Today I started as a fresh Citizendium author, but with a fair amount of Wikipedia experience.
I see that the section Advanced theory in this article is equal to what the corresponding section in the Wikipedia article was before I changed it. I don't want to change it again here without consultation. You can see here how I changed it in Wikipedia.
My objections were: (i) I don't agree that hydrogen bond is mysterious. (ii) I don't know what a metric dependent scalar field is between bonds and hence I cannot understand how it can explain bonding. (iii) It escapes me why it is stated that hydrogen is a bound state phenomenon. For low enough temperatures all molecular complexes are bound, even He2.
Are there any objections to me transferring this to the present article? Or, could someone elaborate/clarify the advanced theory section, so that I can at least understand it and preferably agree with it? Paul Wormer 04:00, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
- Chemistry Category Check
- General Category Check
- Physics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Chemistry Developed Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Chemistry Developing Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Chemistry Stub Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Chemistry External Articles
- Physics External Articles
- Chemistry Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Chemistry Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Physics Cleanup
- Cleanup