Talk:Iron deficiency anemia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Drake
(sanguinary diphthongs)
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


Not trying to settle any questions of American vs. British spelling. Honest. But it needs to be self-consistent. The Wikipedia convention, which I do approve of, is to retain the national spelling and usage conventions of the article in its early stages. This doesn't work, since the first submission was inconsistent. I selected ''emia'' because that's the very first usage, the one in the title (which it's generally a good thing not to change for light and transient reasons). In any case, surely we can avoid the Wikipedia practice of wars in which one national usage or another is considered incorrect. [[User:Daniel Drake|Daniel Drake]] 02:56, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
Not trying to settle any questions of American vs. British spelling. Honest. But it needs to be self-consistent. The Wikipedia convention, which I do approve of, is to retain the national spelling and usage conventions of the article in its early stages. This doesn't work, since the first submission was inconsistent. I selected ''emia'' because that's the very first usage, the one in the title (which it's generally a good thing not to change for light and transient reasons). In any case, surely we can avoid the Wikipedia practice of wars in which one national usage or another is considered incorrect. [[User:Daniel Drake|Daniel Drake]] 02:56, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
==Unsupported statements included in the copy/paste from WP==
This article had no references - now does. Still has lots of disputable/unsupported statements that were copy/pasted from WP
. I tried adding <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> to some of the statements, but this does not appear in the displayed page.[[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 07:29, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:29, 18 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Iron deficiency anemia"
Workgroup category or categories Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 12:22, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Not trying to settle any questions of American vs. British spelling. Honest. But it needs to be self-consistent. The Wikipedia convention, which I do approve of, is to retain the national spelling and usage conventions of the article in its early stages. This doesn't work, since the first submission was inconsistent. I selected emia because that's the very first usage, the one in the title (which it's generally a good thing not to change for light and transient reasons). In any case, surely we can avoid the Wikipedia practice of wars in which one national usage or another is considered incorrect. Daniel Drake 02:56, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

Unsupported statements included in the copy/paste from WP

This article had no references - now does. Still has lots of disputable/unsupported statements that were copy/pasted from WP . I tried adding {{fact}} to some of the statements, but this does not appear in the displayed page.Robert Badgett 07:29, 18 October 2007 (CDT)