User talk:Robert W King

[User bio is in User:Your Name]

Welcome

Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.

Have fun and Happy editing!

--Matt Innis (Talk) 19:00, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Image

Hi Rob. Do me a favor and put some licensing data at the screenshot image page you uploaded. Thanks! Stephen Ewen 00:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I will modify the licensing info today, when I figure out what I need to put!

Formatting line

That line in USS Almaak and other ships is on my browser, too. I think it's the way things work, though I wish it would cut off at the table. Louis F. Sander 20:41, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Maybe it's a known issue and is already on the forums.--Robert W King 08:16, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

history of computing

Robert, hi there, and thanks for contributing to Talk:History_of_computing. I'd like to request that you please don't strike out more of the items on the brainstorm list; they are just suggestions at this point and of course are subject to debate. Instead, please register your opinions as comments below (begin with multiple colons) or new sections on the page. I assure you we will listen to your opinions.Pat Palmer 07:43, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

too much Babbage on "history of computing"; can we move stuff to "Charles Babbage" instead?

Thanks for working on the article. I'd like to keep the Babbage part on history of computing short, and add the details over on Charles Babbage if at all possible. You might think over which place the details you added would best reside; I didn't give it a lot of thought, but I feel the Babbage part of history of computing is now too long (relative to the other sections there). Pat Palmer 14:12, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

See Talk page on history of computing for my response. --Robert W King 16:28, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

History of Computing Timeline

timeline as table YES!

Robert, I like the table version of the timeline at User:Robert_W_King/Sandbox. It might be nice to narrow it up just a bit, but that works; people can add items later if they feel a need. Thanks for checking in about it (and working on history of computing. Pat Palmer 19:56, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

Quill pens

At least I don't use a quill pen on my legal pad -- although with all the quail running around my back yard I suppose that I could catch one and fashion my own. How about a CZ article on making quill pens and one's own ink? Cheers, Hayford Peirce 21:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Burnt toast

I agree with your comments. In fact I'm *appalled* by all the nonsense in it. You should see the hundreds of links that I've already cut out. I'll try whittling it down some more from time to time.... Best, Hayford Peirce 16:15, 4 June 2007 (CDT)

Billiard Balls?

Nope, No idea!!! Funny though :) Do you think he is talking about how billiard balls ricochet off the sides like light reflects??? Dr. Tito definitely keep me thinking:-) Matt Innis (Talk) 13:21, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

apple

The picture was blurry when it was taken, and though I tried to edit it to make it better but that didn't help. I will probably try to take a better picture later and then upload it. Regards. Yi Zhe Wu 13:04, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

I've got a better one on it's way.--Robert W King 13:03, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

It's a lot better. Thanks. You can request deletion of my blurry picture. Just have a question, on your image it says they are two different types of apples, but why they look the same? Regards. Yi Zhe Wu 13:19, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

With apples, often the skin gives it away. --Robert W King 13:23, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

Additionally, I ate them right after taking the picture. They had different texture and slightly different taste, but you'd never know that from the photograph.--Robert W King 13:28, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

Are there no green apples in the USA? About half of apples in Europe are red, the others are green or yellow-green. WE should try to get some pics of non-red ones LOL --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 13:38, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

He ate the green one before the picture... and that must be a really good camera phone! --Matt Innis (Talk) 13:43, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

Example:

Images

Thanks for the tip -- after lunch (no french fries, chips, martinis, or manhattans!), I'll try to make some sense of this image stuff once and for all. Is a puzzlement! Hayford Peirce 14:54, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

I just posted this to Stephen Ewen talk page: "It looks to me as if Attribution gives more rights away, whereas the other one restricts more. And the green color of the Attribution notice apparently means that it is freer than the yellow of Cc. So I guess that in respect to my own photos that I've uploaded it's Attribution that I want. Thanks for the help!" So I thank you also -- this whole image business is certainly an enormous can of worms! Hayford Peirce 17:56, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

Versions

Just a question, what is the difference between cc license versions like 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0? As far as I can read from the text of the licenses, they look the same verbatim. Thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 15:35, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

One can read the CC lists about how they change details in the licenses. It is kind of ridiculous, actually, given that the changes are not really THAT significant, and that it complicates things so much via proliferation of licenses. Stephen Ewen 13:23, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Virginia image

Sure, but it is too big to upload it to CZ, would you like me to email it to you? Also I have several other images from Mount Vernon I took during the March trip, if you would like to see them I can email those as well. Yi Zhe Wu 13:19, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

You can just get a free image viewer life IrfanView which has a simply function to resize images. Stephen Ewen 13:22, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Image email sent. Yi Zhe Wu 13:39, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

It's great! You are an expert in photoshopping. I may resize and upload it. Your credit will be there, but which license would you prefer? Yi Zhe Wu 17:00, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Just CC-by-sa or whatever the rest of my images are, version 3.0.--Robert W King 22:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Hey, no problem, and seems like the mess has been fixed. Thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 10:59, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Humorous edits

Just saw the humor list on your user page. Glad I made the list! Naturally, I saw the edit sum just as a clicked the "post" button and said, "Oh, s**t". But here's one for the ages. On the Highland games article on Wikipedia, one sentence (I wrote it) used to read:

The various clan societies make the Highland games one of the main foci of their seasonal activities . . ."

The Wikipedia editor changed foci to focus commenting in his edit summary that "this is the English Wikipedia, not the Latin". Perhaps he should have said "bad English" since there is now an incorrect agreement of number (singular / plural). Also, I was wondering: should I now start deleting all the Latin (and Latin derivative) words from WP? The word focus is Latin? James F. Perry 12:35, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Image:Mtvernonli.jpg

It's a good idea to say in what way you modified the image. Stephen Ewen 22:11, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Thanks

.. for the help on Unertan Syndrome. Very much appreciated ;-) --Matt Innis (Talk) 15:31, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Anytime.--Robert W King 15:36, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Camembert

Thanks for the offer -- I didn't see it until I had muddled my way through. I must have dropped a </ref> or something somewhere -- this is NOT an intuitive process!Hayford Peirce 16:25, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Thanks -- I'll study those and see what I can do with them. I've mostly just been copying other sources and/or recalling my old U. days many centuries ago. I'm sure, however, that neither CZ or WP will ever be standardized in this matter, no matter how much effort goes into it. Viz, for instance, the arguments about Harvard vs. Vancouver vs. CMS for footnotes.... Hayford Peirce 16:44, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

NFPA

After this edit [1] the problems still persisit in mozilla, firefox and safari. I have to run but will be happy to check things from my end later on. Sorry to be the bearer of this frustrating news. Chris Day (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Left is from the template page, right is from the Scandium page.

The sticky problem has gone away now. When i scroll all the elements stay put. There is still a fitting together issue. You can see what i see on my browser in the figure to the right. Chris Day (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2007 (CDT)

Note i just added the mozilla and firefox screenshots. i have no idea which are the latest versions so i added that info too. Possibly that could make a difference? Not that all three browsers show a subtly different version. Mozilla places the text in the correct place and seem to give the best result. i don't have netscape or IE. Chris Day (talk) 10:21, 3 July 2007 (CDT)