User talk:Aleksander Stos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
It appears they end in October 2008. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | It appears they end in October 2008. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
: October 2008, indeed. Short answer is, well, yes, I should try it. A longer story is that at some point article listings in the categories on the wiki became quite incomplete. This resulted in inconsistencies in stats so that I had to stop. Now, I've just checked and it seems that the listings agree with article counts (so it should work). [[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 19:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | : October 2008, indeed. Short answer is, well, yes, I should try it. A longer story is that at some point article listings in the categories on the wiki became quite incomplete. This resulted in inconsistencies in stats so that I had to stop. Now, I've just checked and it seems that the listings agree with article counts (so it should work). [[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 19:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::It certainly would be reasonable to show a "data loss" in the graphs. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:09, 2 October 2009
Edit Peaks in April & May
We have peak number of edits in April and May every year. Any reason for that? Meg Ireland 14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe Eduzendium activities? Otherwise, no big idea (and remember, "lies, damn lies and statistics" :)) Aleksander Stos 14:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Any chance of more recent progress in time?
It appears they end in October 2008. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- October 2008, indeed. Short answer is, well, yes, I should try it. A longer story is that at some point article listings in the categories on the wiki became quite incomplete. This resulted in inconsistencies in stats so that I had to stop. Now, I've just checked and it seems that the listings agree with article counts (so it should work). Aleksander Stos 19:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- It certainly would be reasonable to show a "data loss" in the graphs. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)