Archaeology: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Nevell (Making the references look like those in Viking longship) |
imported>Richard Nevell (I'll add more on geophysics later) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The [[Renaissance]] saw growing interest in collecting objects for aesthetic reasons, which was a precursor to museums and the study of material culture. One such collection was donated to the [[University of Oxford]] and a museum to house the collection opened in 1683 (the institution would later move to larger permises and become the [[Ashmolean Museum]]). The [[Grand Tour]] – a journey round Europe for those of wealth and independence – saw people become more interested in historic sites.<ref>Greene, Kevin (2002). ''Archaeology: An Introduction'', 4th edition. pp. 16–18. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23355-0.</ref> However, it was not until the 19th century that archaeology emerged as a discipline with methods of recording and preservation. The subject was influenced by principles of [[stratigraphy]], developed in the 17th century by the relatively new study of [[geology]].<ref name=R&B26>Renfrew, Colin & Bahn, Paul (2004). ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', 4th edition. p. 26. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-28441-5.</ref> Archaeology helped shed light on the early history of humanity. The idea that the world was a few thousand years old, based on [[creationism]], was challenged by evidence that man had existed long far longer. As a result, the term "prehistory" was coined.<ref name=R&B26/> | The [[Renaissance]] saw growing interest in collecting objects for aesthetic reasons, which was a precursor to museums and the study of material culture. One such collection was donated to the [[University of Oxford]] and a museum to house the collection opened in 1683 (the institution would later move to larger permises and become the [[Ashmolean Museum]]). The [[Grand Tour]] – a journey round Europe for those of wealth and independence – saw people become more interested in historic sites.<ref>Greene, Kevin (2002). ''Archaeology: An Introduction'', 4th edition. pp. 16–18. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23355-0.</ref> However, it was not until the 19th century that archaeology emerged as a discipline with methods of recording and preservation. The subject was influenced by principles of [[stratigraphy]], developed in the 17th century by the relatively new study of [[geology]].<ref name=R&B26>Renfrew, Colin & Bahn, Paul (2004). ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', 4th edition. p. 26. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-28441-5.</ref> Archaeology helped shed light on the early history of humanity. The idea that the world was a few thousand years old, based on [[creationism]], was challenged by evidence that man had existed long far longer. As a result, the term "prehistory" was coined.<ref name=R&B26/> | ||
==Identifying a site== | |||
A variety of sources can be used to identify archaeological sites; while some sites survive above ground, others are buried and only earthworks are visible. [[Aerial photography]] can identify sites just below the surface which may go unnoticed from ground level. Grass or crops growing above a feature such as a buried wall will have less soil to grow in, so grow differently to plants in normal conditions. Aerial photographs are particularly useful for identifying these marks. The morning or evening are best for taking aerial photographs as the low angle of the sun casts long shadows which help highlight even shallow earthworks. [[Infrared light|Infrared]] photography (which focuses on the area of the electromagnetic spectrum]] close to visible light rather than the range used in thermal imaging) also helps highlight these features.<ref>Green, '' Archaeology: An Introduction'', pp. 62–66.</ref><ref>Renfrew & Bahn, ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', p. 88.</ref> | |||
Non-invasive techniques allow archaeologists to collect information about a site without excavation and the damage it incurs. Field walking is the practice of retrieving finds from the topsoil to assess activity in the area. The technique is most useful on farmland, where periodic ploughing reveals new soil. '''[[Geophysics in archaeology|Geophysics]]''' encompasses several techniques which measure different properties of the soil. The most common are resistivity and magnetometry.<ref>Green, '' Archaeology: An Introduction'', pp. 69–70.</ref> | |||
==Dating methods== | ==Dating methods== | ||
'''Absolute dating''' seeks to apply date ranges to a particular event. Before the development of scientific techniques, this relied on historical documents. The different methods of absolute dating each have their limitations, and in the case of documentary sources the writer’s reason for recording something needs to be scrutinised. Also, the amount of documentation surviving from certain periods and in different societies varies.<ref>Greene, | Dating archaeological contexts and finds is essential to providing a chronology of a site. Methods for dating can be divided into two groups: relative and absolute. '''Relative dating''' is the process of establishing a chronology and placing events or artefacts within this framework. Two common methods are [[stratigraphy]] and [[typology]]. Typological sequences can be constructed when there is a development in design of an object.<ref>Renfrew & Bahn, ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', pp. 121–125.</ref> Mobile phones, for instance, started off as large and bulky devices. Over time they became smaller, and a acquired new features; aerials fell out of use, cameras became common, and the number of buttons decreased as touch screens became more common. Therefore it is possible to take an example of a phone and place it within a certain stage of development without the need to know the precise date the model was manufactured. | ||
'''Absolute dating''' seeks to apply date ranges to a particular event. Before the development of scientific techniques, this relied on historical documents. The different methods of absolute dating each have their limitations, and in the case of documentary sources the writer’s reason for recording something needs to be scrutinised. Also, the amount of documentation surviving from certain periods and in different societies varies.<ref>Greene, ''Archaeology: An Introduction'', pp. 147–149.</ref> In some cases dates can be gleaned from inscriptions, a building may have a dedication marking when it was built, or objects such as coins may include the year they were minted, or the ruler who issued them.<ref>Renfrew & Bahn, ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', p. 135.</ref> [[Dendrochronology]] uses tree rings to date a piece of timber. The changing seasons create a distinct pattern of thick and thin rings. When enough samples have been compiled to established a record of tree ring patterns extending into the past, they can be used to date a piece of timber.<ref>Renfrew & Bahn, ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', pp. 137–138.</ref> The most common method for producing absolute dates is through [[radiocarbon dating]]. Carbon-14, a radioactive isotope, is found in all organic matter an decays at a constant rate. As it is absorbed only by living organisms, by measuring the amount of carbon-14 in an organic sample it is possible to work out its age. It is effective for samples up to 70,000 years old.<ref>Renfrew & Bahn, ''Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice'', p. 141.</ref><ref>Greene, ''Archaeology: An Introduction'', p. 161.</ref> | |||
Absolute dating techniques are most obviously useful when there is no historical record in which to place archaeological discoveries, however they can also be used to challenge established chronologies. For example a building may be dated using typology to say the 14th century, whereas examination of a timber recovered from within the building may produce a different date. If it is earlier than expected, it may challenge the established typology. | Absolute dating techniques are most obviously useful when there is no historical record in which to place archaeological discoveries, however they can also be used to challenge established chronologies. For example a building may be dated using typology to say the 14th century, whereas examination of a timber recovered from within the building may produce a different date. If it is earlier than expected, it may challenge the established typology. |
Revision as of 15:31, 1 October 2012
Archaeology |ɑːkɪˈɒlədʒɪ| (Greek: αρχαίος "ancient" + λόγος "word / speech / discourse"; alternatives: archeology, archæology) is the scientific study of past human cultures by means of the recovery, documentation and analysis of material remains and environmental data. The broad scientific goals of archaeology are to document and explain the development of human culture, globally and diachronically, from its origins to the recent past. Methods include invasive practices such as excavation and non-invasive procedures such as the use of geophysics.
A practitioner of the discipline of archaeology is generally known as an "archaeologist". Archaeologists tend to develop one or more specialisations—with respect to technique, region and/or period studied—in the course of their training and career.
Development of the study
The Renaissance saw growing interest in collecting objects for aesthetic reasons, which was a precursor to museums and the study of material culture. One such collection was donated to the University of Oxford and a museum to house the collection opened in 1683 (the institution would later move to larger permises and become the Ashmolean Museum). The Grand Tour – a journey round Europe for those of wealth and independence – saw people become more interested in historic sites.[1] However, it was not until the 19th century that archaeology emerged as a discipline with methods of recording and preservation. The subject was influenced by principles of stratigraphy, developed in the 17th century by the relatively new study of geology.[2] Archaeology helped shed light on the early history of humanity. The idea that the world was a few thousand years old, based on creationism, was challenged by evidence that man had existed long far longer. As a result, the term "prehistory" was coined.[2]
Identifying a site
A variety of sources can be used to identify archaeological sites; while some sites survive above ground, others are buried and only earthworks are visible. Aerial photography can identify sites just below the surface which may go unnoticed from ground level. Grass or crops growing above a feature such as a buried wall will have less soil to grow in, so grow differently to plants in normal conditions. Aerial photographs are particularly useful for identifying these marks. The morning or evening are best for taking aerial photographs as the low angle of the sun casts long shadows which help highlight even shallow earthworks. Infrared photography (which focuses on the area of the electromagnetic spectrum]] close to visible light rather than the range used in thermal imaging) also helps highlight these features.[3][4]
Non-invasive techniques allow archaeologists to collect information about a site without excavation and the damage it incurs. Field walking is the practice of retrieving finds from the topsoil to assess activity in the area. The technique is most useful on farmland, where periodic ploughing reveals new soil. Geophysics encompasses several techniques which measure different properties of the soil. The most common are resistivity and magnetometry.[5]
Dating methods
Dating archaeological contexts and finds is essential to providing a chronology of a site. Methods for dating can be divided into two groups: relative and absolute. Relative dating is the process of establishing a chronology and placing events or artefacts within this framework. Two common methods are stratigraphy and typology. Typological sequences can be constructed when there is a development in design of an object.[6] Mobile phones, for instance, started off as large and bulky devices. Over time they became smaller, and a acquired new features; aerials fell out of use, cameras became common, and the number of buttons decreased as touch screens became more common. Therefore it is possible to take an example of a phone and place it within a certain stage of development without the need to know the precise date the model was manufactured.
Absolute dating seeks to apply date ranges to a particular event. Before the development of scientific techniques, this relied on historical documents. The different methods of absolute dating each have their limitations, and in the case of documentary sources the writer’s reason for recording something needs to be scrutinised. Also, the amount of documentation surviving from certain periods and in different societies varies.[7] In some cases dates can be gleaned from inscriptions, a building may have a dedication marking when it was built, or objects such as coins may include the year they were minted, or the ruler who issued them.[8] Dendrochronology uses tree rings to date a piece of timber. The changing seasons create a distinct pattern of thick and thin rings. When enough samples have been compiled to established a record of tree ring patterns extending into the past, they can be used to date a piece of timber.[9] The most common method for producing absolute dates is through radiocarbon dating. Carbon-14, a radioactive isotope, is found in all organic matter an decays at a constant rate. As it is absorbed only by living organisms, by measuring the amount of carbon-14 in an organic sample it is possible to work out its age. It is effective for samples up to 70,000 years old.[10][11]
Absolute dating techniques are most obviously useful when there is no historical record in which to place archaeological discoveries, however they can also be used to challenge established chronologies. For example a building may be dated using typology to say the 14th century, whereas examination of a timber recovered from within the building may produce a different date. If it is earlier than expected, it may challenge the established typology.
References
- ↑ Greene, Kevin (2002). Archaeology: An Introduction, 4th edition. pp. 16–18. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23355-0.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Renfrew, Colin & Bahn, Paul (2004). Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, 4th edition. p. 26. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-28441-5.
- ↑ Green, Archaeology: An Introduction, pp. 62–66.
- ↑ Renfrew & Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, p. 88.
- ↑ Green, Archaeology: An Introduction, pp. 69–70.
- ↑ Renfrew & Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, pp. 121–125.
- ↑ Greene, Archaeology: An Introduction, pp. 147–149.
- ↑ Renfrew & Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, p. 135.
- ↑ Renfrew & Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, pp. 137–138.
- ↑ Renfrew & Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, p. 141.
- ↑ Greene, Archaeology: An Introduction, p. 161.