Talk:Tree (plant): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|              status = 4
|             orphan = n
|         underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 10:47, 8 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Tree (plant)"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera. They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now. Thoughts? Ian Ramjohn 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. Nancy Sculerati MD 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)