Talk:Microorganism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Tribe No edit summary |
imported>David Tribe |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think this article starts badly and is <s>boring</s> bland. I propose to start from scratch and De WP edia it. This will take time. I will do it so that access to the current one is preserved. An I am giving fair notice, in case there is disagreement. Im the only one to edit it here anyway. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 07:29, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | I think this article starts badly and is <s>boring</s> bland. I propose to start from scratch and De WP edia it. This will take time. I will do it so that access to the current one is preserved. An I am giving fair notice, in case there is disagreement. Im the only one to edit it here anyway. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 07:29, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
===NEW DRAFT OF ARTICLE=== | |||
Revision as of 07:31, 17 March 2007
The gap from Leeuwenhoek to Pasteur is a very long one. When L is mentioned, Would it be better to talk about why L. did do than what he did not.?DavidGoodman 21:02, 24 November 2006 (CST)
- The statments that visible /invisible have exceptions occurs at least 5 times, 1 in each section.
- The section on eukaryotic microorganisms neeeds to specifiy just what is included--a good trick--(my first research exerience was in protozoology, as it was then called). As you undoubtedly intend to include fungi, you'll have to explain that they are not plants. We should probably do a fngii article fairly early on. I'll start one from WP.DavidGoodman 20:51, 25 November 2006 (CST)
Complete rewrite
I think this article starts badly and is boring bland. I propose to start from scratch and De WP edia it. This will take time. I will do it so that access to the current one is preserved. An I am giving fair notice, in case there is disagreement. Im the only one to edit it here anyway. David Tribe 07:29, 17 March 2007 (CDT)