CZ Talk:Games Workgroup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Still (Reply.) |
imported>Roberto Cruz No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Probably not, as [[Ball games]] (for example) really is a [[Sports]] article. - [[User:Peter Blake|Peter Blake]] 18:00, 20 November 2006 (CST) | * Probably not, as [[Ball games]] (for example) really is a [[Sports]] article. - [[User:Peter Blake|Peter Blake]] 18:00, 20 November 2006 (CST) | ||
* It's important to say that, nowadays, [[Chess]] has a ''sport status'' as well. --[[User:Roberto Cruz|Roberto]] 11:39, 26 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:39, 26 January 2007
The main Games article contains a list of type of games. Do you think this list is a good way to divide the subject? - Peter Blake 17:01, 20 November 2006 (CST)
- Probably not, as Ball games (for example) really is a Sports article. - Peter Blake 18:00, 20 November 2006 (CST)
- It's important to say that, nowadays, Chess has a sport status as well. --Roberto 11:39, 26 January 2007 (CST)
I've been tagging some articles in areas I know a little about. The following topics seem to have enough pages to justify their own sub-workgroups:
- Chess
- Collectible card games
- Computer and video games (will have significant overlap with other workgroups r.e. computer versions of other game types)
- Role-playing games
I'll add to this list as I get a better feel for what's out there. - Peter Blake 18:10, 20 November 2006 (CST)
- I've been working extensively at the Wikipedia version of Personal computer game, so I'll probably spend some time on that. It's a fairly specific article, but given it's current shape I'd appreciate some help with it -- there's a lot of work still to be done on it. David Still 16:22, 21 November 2006 (CST)