Exchange sacrifice (chess): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Towns
(My first article for CZ...will continue working on it to improve)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An exchange sacrifice occurs when one [[chess]] player gives up a [[rook_(chess) | rook]] for a [[minor_piece | minor piece]] ([[bishop_(chess) | bishop]] or [[knight_(chess) | knight]]). It is often used to destroy the enemy [[pawn_(chess) | pawn]] structure, to establish a minor piece on a strong square (often threatening the enemy [[king_(chess) | king]]), to improve one's own pawn structure (creating, for example, connected passed pawns), or to gain time for development. [[Tigran Petrosian]], the World Champion from 1963-1969, was well known for his especially creative use of this device; in the game Reshevsky-Petrosian, Zurich 1953, he sacrificed the exchange on move 25, only for his opponent to sacrifice it in return on move 30 (the game ended in a draw); this game is perhaps the most famous and most frequently taught example of the exchange sacrifice.
{{subpages}}


Due to the exchange sacrifice leading to long-term positional advantages, it is often referred to as the ''positional exchange sacrifice''.
An '''exchange sacrifice''' occurs when one [[chess]] player gives up a [[Rook (chess)|rook]] for a minor piece ([[Bishop (chess)|bishop]] or [[Knight (chess)|knight]]). It is distinguished from a pure [[sacrifice (chess)|sacrifice]] that leads to [[Checkmate|mate]] in the sense that an exchange sacrifice, properly speaking, leads to a long term positional or strategic advantage as opposed to a short term tactical advantage.
 
Exchange sacrifices are often used to destroy the enemy [[Pawn (chess) | pawn]] structure, to establish a minor piece on a strong square (often threatening the enemy [[King (chess) | king]]), to improve one's own pawn structure (creating, for example, connected passed pawns), or to gain time for development. [[Tigran Petrosian]], the World Champion from 1963 to 1969, was well known for his especially creative use of this device; in the game Reshevsky-Petrosian, [[Zurich]] 1953, he exchange-sacrificed on move twenty-five, only for his opponent to sacrifice in return on move thirty (the game ended in a draw); this game is perhaps the most famous and most frequently taught example of the exchange sacrifice.
 
Because the exchange sacrifice leads to long-term positional advantages, it is often referred to as the ''positional exchange sacrifice''.


== Notable chess games involving the exchange sacrifice ==
== Notable chess games involving the exchange sacrifice ==
 
*[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106248 Samuel Reshevsky vs Tigran Petrosian, Zurich 1953, Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with 8...Bxc3 (E58), 1/2-1/2] A famous example, mentioned above, that features two exchange sacrifices.
*[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106248 Samuel Reshevsky vs Tigran Petrosian, Zurich 1953, Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with 8...Bxc3 (E58), 1/2-1/2] A famous example, mentioned above, that features ''two'' exchange sacrifices.
*[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106392 Mikhail Tal vs Tigran Petrosian, Riga 1958, Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin (C97), 1/2-1/2] Two future world champions battle for victory; Petrosian offers an exchange sacrifice on move thirty-one.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
*[http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1106392 Mikhail Tal vs Tigran Petrosian, Riga 1958, Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin (C97), 1/2-1/2] Two future world champions battle for victory; Petrosian offers an exchange sacrifice on move 31.

Latest revision as of 16:00, 14 August 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

An exchange sacrifice occurs when one chess player gives up a rook for a minor piece (bishop or knight). It is distinguished from a pure sacrifice that leads to mate in the sense that an exchange sacrifice, properly speaking, leads to a long term positional or strategic advantage as opposed to a short term tactical advantage.

Exchange sacrifices are often used to destroy the enemy pawn structure, to establish a minor piece on a strong square (often threatening the enemy king), to improve one's own pawn structure (creating, for example, connected passed pawns), or to gain time for development. Tigran Petrosian, the World Champion from 1963 to 1969, was well known for his especially creative use of this device; in the game Reshevsky-Petrosian, Zurich 1953, he exchange-sacrificed on move twenty-five, only for his opponent to sacrifice in return on move thirty (the game ended in a draw); this game is perhaps the most famous and most frequently taught example of the exchange sacrifice.

Because the exchange sacrifice leads to long-term positional advantages, it is often referred to as the positional exchange sacrifice.

Notable chess games involving the exchange sacrifice