Tracking error: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
m (WP credit)
imported>Meg Taylor
m (spelling: usefullness -> usefulness)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Many portfolios are managed to a [[benchmark]], such as an index (i.e. the S&P500 in the USA or the CAC40 in France).  Some portfolios are expected to replicate the returns of an index exactly (an [[index fund]]), while others are expected to deviate slightly from the index in order to generate excess returns or to lower transaction costs.  Tracking error is a measure of how closely the portfolio follows the index, and is measured as the standard deviation of the difference between the portfolio and index returns.
{{subpages}}


Many portfolios are managed against a [[benchmark]], such as an index (for example, the S&P500 in the USA or the CAC40 in France).  Some portfolios are expected to replicate the returns of an index exactly (an [[index fund]]), while others are expected to deviate slightly from the index in order to generate excess returns or to lower transaction costs.  Tracking error (a.k.a. ''Active Risk'') is a measure of how closely the portfolio follows the index, and is measured as the standard deviation of the difference between the portfolio and index returns.


If tracking error is measured historically, it is called 'realised' or 'ex post' tracking error.  If a model is used to predict tracking error, it is called 'ex ante' tracking error.  The former is more useful for reporting or analysis purposes, whereas ex ante is generally used by portfolio managers to control risk to satisfy client guidelines.
There is two ways to express the objective of a fund manager: either minimizing the tracking error for a given expected return over a predefined benchmark or maximizing the expected return for a given tracking error.


'''Tracking error''' is mathematically the same as [[Active Risk]], and has historically been used in the context of index portfolio or fund management, but, especially in Europe, is now typically used to describe the [[standard deviation]] of returns, either active or passive. The active return is the difference in the return of a portfolio and its benchmark.
== Ex-ante vs ex-post tracking error ==
An index manager aiming to match the return of a benchmark index seeks to minimize realised tracking error, i.e. the standard deviation of returns about the benchmark. Using the tracking error will allow him to slightly decrease the replication (because of beeing allowed to deviate from the benchmark) with an important decrease in transaction costs. Optimizers, based on 'ex-ante' (see below) tracking will help the manager in the construction of his portfolio. 
An active portfolio manager, on the other hand, aims to achieve a positive active return with a low active risk. 


It is important to distinguish between observed, or realised, tracking error and predicted tracking error.  For active portfolios 'ex ante' tracking error measures are necessarily lower than 'ex post'This is because future portfolio weights are randomly, but normally distributed around a mean (‘ex post [[stochastic]]’).   Some studies have suggested a factor of as high as two (see ''Tracking error : ex ante versus ex post measures'', Satchell and Hwang, Journal of Asset Management, Vol 2. No 3, December 2001).  
If tracking error is measured historically, it is called 'realised' or 'ex post' tracking error.  A model is usually used to predict tracking error (a.k.a. ''ex-ante tracking error''). The former is more useful for reporting or analysis purposes, whereas ex ante is generally used by portfolio managers to control risk to satisfy client guidelines.


'''Tracking Error = stdev(RETURN(portfolio) - beta * RETURN(index))'''
Fabozzi et al. (2006) cite, and briefly describe, three different multifactor models used in equity portfolio management to predict tracking error:
* Statistical Factor Models
* Macroeconomic Factor Models
* Fundamental Factors Models


In the finance industry, some models are well-known and widely used by practitionners. Among them, we can notice the MSCI Barra Models (based on factors such as country, industry, style or currency) and the Northfield Fundamental Equity Model.


Hwang and Satchell (2001) have argued that ex-ante and ex-post tracking error must differ, as portfolio weights are ex-post stochatic in nature. Furthermore, they showed that ex-port tracking error must be higher than ex-ante tracking error.


==Mathematical definition==
As defined in Chincarini and Daehwan (2006), most portfolio managers when using tracking error define it as beeing the standard deviation of the returns of the portfolio minus the returns of the benchmark.


[[Category:Economics Workgroup]]
It can be expressed as:
[[Category:CZ Live]]
 
<math>TE=\sigma(r_P-r_B)=\sqrt{ r_P - r_B } </math>
 
where <math>r_P</math> is the returns of the portfolio
<math>r_B</math> is the return of the benchmark
 
As the porfolio manager is working with a sample (and not the full history of datas), we have to adjust that formula for degrees of freedom (see Shein (2000)). In that case, the tracking error formula can be written as:
 
<math>TE=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{p=1}^{N} (R_P-R_B)^2}{N-1} }</math>
 
where N is the number of return periods.
 
==Limitations==
Despite its usefulness for asset managers and investors, the tracking error suffers from some limitations:
* Tracking error assumes a normal distribution. As beeing showed by recent works, return distribtions are not normal and therefore, using tracking error can be misleading.
* Tracking error do not provide any information about how the risk level was achieved.
* Tracking error is only a risk indicator, and should not be used as performance indicator. As showed by Cremers and Petajisto (2006), managers are too often trying to minimize tracking error, whichl leads to low excess return.
 
==References==
Chincarini, L. and Daehwan K. (2006), ''Quantitative Equity Portfolio Management'', Mc Graw Hill
 
Cremers, M., Petajisto, A. (2006), “How Active is your Fund Manager? A New Measure that Predicts Performance”, International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management
 
Hwang, S, and Satchell, SE. (2001) "Tracking error: Ex ante versus ex post measures", ''Journal of Asset Management'', Volume 2, Number 3, 1 December, pp. 241-246(6)
 
Fabozzi, Focardi and Kolm, ''Financial Modeling of the Equity Market'', Wiley Finance, 2006
 
Shein, L., "Tracking Error and the Information Ratio", ''The Journal of Investment Consulting'', IMCA, Vol.2, Numbr 2, June 2000

Latest revision as of 22:37, 14 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Many portfolios are managed against a benchmark, such as an index (for example, the S&P500 in the USA or the CAC40 in France). Some portfolios are expected to replicate the returns of an index exactly (an index fund), while others are expected to deviate slightly from the index in order to generate excess returns or to lower transaction costs. Tracking error (a.k.a. Active Risk) is a measure of how closely the portfolio follows the index, and is measured as the standard deviation of the difference between the portfolio and index returns.

There is two ways to express the objective of a fund manager: either minimizing the tracking error for a given expected return over a predefined benchmark or maximizing the expected return for a given tracking error.

Ex-ante vs ex-post tracking error

If tracking error is measured historically, it is called 'realised' or 'ex post' tracking error. A model is usually used to predict tracking error (a.k.a. ex-ante tracking error). The former is more useful for reporting or analysis purposes, whereas ex ante is generally used by portfolio managers to control risk to satisfy client guidelines.

Fabozzi et al. (2006) cite, and briefly describe, three different multifactor models used in equity portfolio management to predict tracking error:

  • Statistical Factor Models
  • Macroeconomic Factor Models
  • Fundamental Factors Models

In the finance industry, some models are well-known and widely used by practitionners. Among them, we can notice the MSCI Barra Models (based on factors such as country, industry, style or currency) and the Northfield Fundamental Equity Model.

Hwang and Satchell (2001) have argued that ex-ante and ex-post tracking error must differ, as portfolio weights are ex-post stochatic in nature. Furthermore, they showed that ex-port tracking error must be higher than ex-ante tracking error.

Mathematical definition

As defined in Chincarini and Daehwan (2006), most portfolio managers when using tracking error define it as beeing the standard deviation of the returns of the portfolio minus the returns of the benchmark.

It can be expressed as:

where is the returns of the portfolio is the return of the benchmark

As the porfolio manager is working with a sample (and not the full history of datas), we have to adjust that formula for degrees of freedom (see Shein (2000)). In that case, the tracking error formula can be written as:

where N is the number of return periods.

Limitations

Despite its usefulness for asset managers and investors, the tracking error suffers from some limitations:

  • Tracking error assumes a normal distribution. As beeing showed by recent works, return distribtions are not normal and therefore, using tracking error can be misleading.
  • Tracking error do not provide any information about how the risk level was achieved.
  • Tracking error is only a risk indicator, and should not be used as performance indicator. As showed by Cremers and Petajisto (2006), managers are too often trying to minimize tracking error, whichl leads to low excess return.

References

Chincarini, L. and Daehwan K. (2006), Quantitative Equity Portfolio Management, Mc Graw Hill

Cremers, M., Petajisto, A. (2006), “How Active is your Fund Manager? A New Measure that Predicts Performance”, International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management

Hwang, S, and Satchell, SE. (2001) "Tracking error: Ex ante versus ex post measures", Journal of Asset Management, Volume 2, Number 3, 1 December, pp. 241-246(6)

Fabozzi, Focardi and Kolm, Financial Modeling of the Equity Market, Wiley Finance, 2006

Shein, L., "Tracking Error and the Information Ratio", The Journal of Investment Consulting, IMCA, Vol.2, Numbr 2, June 2000