Talk:Monarchy of the United Kingdom/Addendum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson (Created page with ""in order of preference"? Should that be "precedence"? If so (or indeed if not), where does this list come from? Traditional orders list men and women separately, except for the ...") |
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"in order of preference"? Should that be "precedence"? If so (or indeed if not), where does this list come from? Traditional orders list men and women separately, except for the Queen herself above everyone. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | "in order of preference"? Should that be "precedence"? If so (or indeed if not), where does this list come from? Traditional orders list men and women separately, except for the Queen herself above everyone. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Thank you for pointing out the slip. The source I used is [http://www.historyguy.com/worldbiography/british_royal_family.htm#.T46YjdmiGuR]. Can you recommend a more authoritative source? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
::The royal website isn't explicit, but I get the impression there are different orders of precedence in different contexts, so this one's quite likely to be right in some sense. may as well leave it for now. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 13:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:31, 19 April 2012
"in order of preference"? Should that be "precedence"? If so (or indeed if not), where does this list come from? Traditional orders list men and women separately, except for the Queen herself above everyone. Peter Jackson 10:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing out the slip. The source I used is [1]. Can you recommend a more authoritative source? Nick Gardner 10:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- The royal website isn't explicit, but I get the impression there are different orders of precedence in different contexts, so this one's quite likely to be right in some sense. may as well leave it for now. Peter Jackson 13:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)